Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "c9168df2".
2015 Nov 06
2
Instructions with no operand
On 11/6/2015 11:35 AM, Sky Flyer via llvm-dev wrote:
> Guys, I stuck at this point. Could you please give me a hint how to
> solve this problem without touching the LLVM backbone?!
> Why LLVM doesn't let me define an instruction consisting of an operator
> with no operand?
Could you try it without the pattern? I.e. just this:
class TestInst<string opc, string asmstr,