search for: c8t0d0

...i8086,4021 at 1/pci103c,3229 at 0/sd at 2,0 2. c7t3d0 <ATA-GB1000EAFJL-HPG1-931.51GB> /pci at 0,0/pci8086,4021 at 1/pci103c,3229 at 0/sd at 3,0 3. c7t4d0 <ATA-GB1000EAFJL-HPG1-931.51GB> /pci at 0,0/pci8086,4021 at 1/pci103c,3229 at 0/sd at 4,0 4. c8t0d0 <DEFAULT cyl 1958 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci103c,31fe at 1d,7/storage at 8/disk at 0,0 5. c11t0d0 <Kingston-DataTraveler2.0-1.00 cyl 1958 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci103c,31fe at 1d,7/storage at 6/disk at 0,0 Specify disk (enter its number):...

...the array, currently: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM gpool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas raidz1 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas c8t2d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open c8t4d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open c8t0d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open These drives had power all the time, the SATA cable however was disconnected. Now, after I logged into Solaris and opened firefox, I plugged them back in to sit and watch if the storage pool suddenly becomes "available" This did not happen, so my...

...0.5 35.2 1.2 47 48 c5t0d0 0.0 156.0 0.0 18327.1 4.6 0.2 29.5 1.1 17 18 c5t1d0 0.0 7.0 0.0 132.0 2.7 0.0 386.0 4.9 56 2 c5t2d0 0.0 293.0 0.0 36735.2 13.4 0.3 45.6 1.1 89 34 c5t3d0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c8t0d0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c8t1d0 0.0 142.0 0.0 17409.8 4.9 0.2 34.9 1.4 20 20 c6t0d0 0.0 350.0 0.0 44030.5 12.6 0.4 36.0 1.3 44 44 c6t1d0 0.0 291.0 0.0 34599.7 9.6 0.3 33.1 1.2 34 35 c6t2d0 0.0 334.0 0.0 40...

Hiya, Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don''t start at 0 (zero). For some reason mine are like this (3 controllers - 1 onboard and 2 PCIe); AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1 cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci10de,cb84 at 5/disk at 0,0 1. c8t1d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1 cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci10de,cb84 at 5/disk at 1,0 2. c9t7d0 <ATA-HitachiHDS72302-A5C...

...group state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM group ONLINE 0 0 0 ..raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c8t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ..mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c10d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors jsmith at corax:~# zfs list group NAME USED...

I know this topic has been discussed many times... but what the hell makes zpool resilvering so slow? I''m running OpenSolaris 2009.06. I have had a large number of problematic disks due to a bad production batch, leading me to resilver quite a few times, progressively replacing each disk as it dies (and now preemptively removing disks.) My complaint is that resilvering ends up

...1:~# zpool status tank pool: tank state: DEGRADED scrub: scrub stopped after 0h10m with 0 errors on Wed Oct 14 15:23:06 2009 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t6d0...

...c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t5d0 ONLINE...

...NLINE 0 0 0 c4t38d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t39d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t40d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t41d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t42d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 cache c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c4t43d0 INUSE currently in use c4t44d0 INUSE currently in use errors: No known data errors root at prv-backup:~# -- Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Ro...

...rsion = 0x0 ??? ??? scheme = zfs ??? ??? pool = 0x4406b127a905c5be ??? ??? vdev = 0x6f08aad645681b14 ??? (end detector) ??? pool = rsgis ??? pool_guid = 0x4406b127a905c5be ??? pool_context = 1 ??? pool_failmode = wait ??? vdev_guid = 0x6f08aad645681b14 ??? vdev_type = disk ??? vdev_path = /dev/dsk/c8t0d0s0 ??? vdev_devid = id1,sd at AHITACHI_HDS7225SBSUN250G_0615NE18BJ=VDS41DT4EE18BJ/a ??? parent_guid = 0xb89f3c5a72a22939 ??? parent_type = mirror ??? prev_state = 0x1 ??? __ttl = 0x1 ??? __tod = 0x4c40be67 0x272aeed8 Jul 16 2010 15:17:43.657125769 ereport.fs.zfs.vdev.no_replicas nvlist version: 0 ?...

...home DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ON...

...on of the vhdd was done with vmwarevdiskmanager in a minute. My vhdd is now about 20gb, but osol didn''t see , that the capacity of the disk was increased. How do i make new unallocated free-space on my vhdd visible/usable for osol ?! I''ve olready tried to do: zpool add -f rpool c8t0d0 but get an error: invalid vdev specification the following errors must be manually repaired: /dev/dsk/c8t0d0s0 is part of active ZFS pool rpool. Please see zpool(1M). I attach some logs (zfs list, zpool list and zpool status -v) So. What should I do first? P.S. Sorry for my English. -- This m...

...2 1.18M 41.5K c7t3d0 - - 34 2 1.18M 41.5K c7t4d0 - - 33 2 1.18M 41.5K c7t5d0 - - 33 2 1.18M 41.5K c7t6d0 - - 34 2 1.18M 41.5K c7t7d0 - - 33 2 1.18M 41.5K c8t0d0 - - 35 2 1.18M 41.5K raidz2 12.4T 277G 84 5 4.81M 278K c8t1d0 - - 35 3 1.22M 56.1K c8t2d0 - - 34 3 1.22M 56.1K c8t3d0 - - 35 3 1.22M 56.1K c8t4d0 - - 35...

Hi all I''m seeing some rather bad resilver times for a pool of WD Green drives (I know, bad drives, but leave that). Does resilver go through the whole pool or just the VDEV in question? -- Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 roy at karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres

...13 27.4T scanned out of 69.6T at 183M/s, 67h11m to go 2.43T resilvered, 39.32% done config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM test DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t1d0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c8t2d0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c8t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare-4 DEGRADED 0 0 0...

Hi, I''m running Opensolaris 2009.06, and I''m facing a serious performance loss with ZFS ! It''s a raidz1 pool, made of 4 x 1TB SATA disks : zfs_raid ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0

Banging my head against a Seagate 3TB USB3 drive. Its marketing name is: Seagate Expansion 3 TB USB 3.0 Desktop External Hard Drive STAY3000102 format(1M) shows it identify itself as: Seagate-External-SG11-2.73TB Under both Solaris 10 and Solaris 11x, I receive the evil message: | I/O request is not aligned with 4096 disk sector size. | It is handled through Read Modify Write but the performance