Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "c8887abf".
2013 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
On 08/17/2013 12:08 AM, Star Tan wrote:
> At 2013-08-16 22:32:30,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, I have changed the original code to the form you suggested:
>>> for (i
>>> for (j
>>> ...
>>> x=1
>>
>> Sorry, I meant
>>
2013 Aug 19
1
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
...to take a look.
Sure, I would like to investigate if they are indeed useful to reduce the compile-time of Polly.
Thanks for your suggestions!
Star Tan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130820/c8887abf/attachment.html>
2013 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Analysis of extra compile-time overhead for simple nested loops
At 2013-08-16 22:32:30,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I have changed the original code to the form you suggested:
>> for (i
>> for (j
>> ...
>> x=1
>
>Sorry, I meant
> x[0] +=
>
It is interesting that Polly would run much faster if we change the