search for: c7t1d0

...l. However, when I exported the test pool and imported, I get an error. Here is what I did: I created a file to use as a backing store for my new pool: mkfile 1g /data01/test2/1gtest Created a new pool: zpool create ziltest2 /data01/test2/1gtest Added the SSD as a log: zpool add -f ziltest2 log c7t1d0 (c7t1d0 is my SSD. I used the -f option since I had done this before with a pool called ''ziltest'', same results) A ''zpool status'' returned no errors. Exported: zpool export ziltest2 Imported: zpool import -d /data01/test2 ziltest2 cannot import ''zilt...

...ller pci bus 0x0088 cardnum 0x01 function 0x00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3124 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial ATA Controller c5*, c6* and c7* are the eSATA disks. zpool create -f zfsatan mirror c5t0d0 c5t1d0 mirror c5t2d0 c5t3d0 mirror c6t0d0 c6t1d0 mirror c6t2d0 c6t3d0 mirror c7t0d0 c7t1d0 mirror c7t2d0 c7t3d0 zfs create zfsatan/fs01 -bash-3.2# time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024x1024x1024 count=8 of=/zfsatan/ fs01/storfil 8+0 records in 8+0 records out real 2m58.863s user 0m0.001s sys 0m10.636s gives me for this run a 8192/178 gives me around 46MBytes / second... That is...

...operations bandwidth pool alloc free read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- pool 9.53T 1.34T 804 8 34.8M 33.0K raidz2 9.53T 1.34T 804 8 34.8M 33.0K c7t0d0 - - 296 3 11.9M 17.9K c7t1d0 - - 338 3 10.7M 17.9K c7t2d0 - - 367 3 10.4M 17.9K c7t3d0 - - 333 3 12.0M 17.9K c7t4d0 - - 340 3 10.7M 17.9K c7t5d0 - - 340 3 10.5M 17.9K cache - - - -...

...graded zfs from 13 to 19. See pool status post-upgrade: root at arc:/# zpool status pool: pool1 state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ W...

...0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0...

...raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE...

...jsmith at corax:~# zpool status group pool: group state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM group ONLINE 0 0 0 ..raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c8t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ..mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ....c10d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors...

...c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0...

...on if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM myth ONLINE 0 0 48 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 48 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: Permanent errors have been detected in the following files: /myth/tv/1504_20080216203700.mpg /myth/tv/15...

...0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0...

So, what is the story about 4KB disk sectors? Should such disks be avoided with ZFS? Or, no problem? Or, need to modify some config file before usage? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

(From the README) # Jeb Campbell <jebc at c4solutions.net> NOTE: This is last resort if you need your data now. This worked for me, and I hope it works for you. If you have any reservations, please wait for Sun to release something official, and don''t blame me if your data is gone. PS -- This worked for me b/c I didn''t try and replace the log on a running system. My

...fffff000cb54ca0 devzvol_lookup+0xf8() ffffff000cb54d20 sdev_iter_datasets+0xb0() ffffff000cb54da0 devzvol_readdir+0xd6() ffffff000cb54e20 fop_readdir+0xab() ffffff000cb54ec0 getdents64+0xbc() ffffff000cb54f10 sys_syscall32+0xff() -- DISK--- -bash-4.0$ sudo /usr/sbin/zdb -l /dev/dsk/c7t1d0s0 -------------------------------------------- LABEL 0 -------------------------------------------- version: 22 name: ''puddle'' state: 0 txg: 55553139 pool_guid: 13462109782214169516 hostid: 4421991 hostname: ''amd'' top_guid: 1589524...

...c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ON...

...t; c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t2d0 ONLINE...

...advance, Vizzini The system is currently running snv_98, zfs on disk version of 10, and eight 500GB disks in the following configuration: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM dpool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 -- This message posted from opensolar...

...0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ** Heres the resilver spare ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 18 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 *** c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ON...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

I was messing around with a ramdisk on a pool and I forgot to remove it before I shut down the server. Now I am not able to mount the pool. I am not concerned with the data in this pool, but I would like to try to figure out how to recover it. I am running Nexenta 3.0 NCP (b134+). I have tried a couple of the commands (zpool import -f and zpool import -FX llift) root at

Long story short, my cat jumped on my server at my house crashing two drives at the same time. It was a 7 drive raidz (next time ill do raidz2). The server crashed complaining about a drive failure, so i rebooted into single user mode not realizing that two drives failed. I put in a new 500g replacement and had zfs start a replace operation which failed at about 2% because there was two broken