Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "c76224".
Did you mean:
376224
2019 Mar 09
1
Spurious warning from checkReplaceFuns about a non-replacement function
If a function contains the pattern `<-` it is (with a few exceptions)
deemed to be a replacement function and in particular must have second
argument `value` to pass R CMD check.
Consider the function %<->% or any other function containing <- within
grapes. I claim that such functions should not be considered
replacement functions and thus the R CMD check should not require its
second