search for: c74a2a57

On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:22 AM, Dmitry Babokin <babokin at gmail.com> wrote: > Bill, > > Thanks for answering. To make sure that we are on the same page, let's agree on definitions :) Here, by fat binaries I mean the binary, where some functions are compiled for one flavor of x86, while others are compiled for another flavor of x86. I care about the usage model, which is

...problem? > > > That's correct. It still needs to be implemented (of course), but that's > the eventual goal. > > -bw > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131011/c74a2a57/attachment.html>

Bill, Thanks for answering. To make sure that we are on the same page, let's agree on definitions :) Here, by fat binaries I mean the binary, where some functions are compiled for one flavor of x86, while others are compiled for another flavor of x86. I care about the usage model, which is important for LTO - a dispatch function (compiled for the least common denominator) + plus set of