search for: c73686a3

Yep, b.w using ARM's "alternative syntax" is broken. Luckily, though LLVM bitcode doesn't compile to this form, and will always use a label instead. Here's a patch that only acknowledges the broken instructions: https://github.com/garious/llvm/commit/916c4badd816178da9fdbac5b5ed2331a7201f98 I submitted this to llvm-commits a while back, but nobody replied. :( -Greg

Hi all. I came across a strange behaviour in the instruction printer for Thumbv2: The instruction is 0xf000b800, which is a b.w #0 LLVM returns it as b.w #-262144, which doesn't make any sense to me. Should I consider it a bug? -- Vladimir Pouzanov http://www.farcaller.net/

...LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121227/c73686a3/attachment.html>