search for: c6t0d0

Hello, What is the access algorithm used within multi-component pools for a given pool, and does it change when one or more members of the pool become degraded ? examples: zpool create mtank mirror c1t0d0 c2t0d0 mirror c3t0d0 c4t0d0 mirror c5t0d0 c6t0d0 or; zpool create ztank raidz c1t0d0 c2t0d0 c3t0d0 raidz c4t0d0 c5t0d0 c6t0d0 As files are created on the filesystem within these pools, are they distributed round-robin accross the components, or do they stay with the first component till full then go to the next, or is some other technique u...

...icon Image, Inc. SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial ATA Controller pci bus 0x0088 cardnum 0x01 function 0x00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3124 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial ATA Controller c5*, c6* and c7* are the eSATA disks. zpool create -f zfsatan mirror c5t0d0 c5t1d0 mirror c5t2d0 c5t3d0 mirror c6t0d0 c6t1d0 mirror c6t2d0 c6t3d0 mirror c7t0d0 c7t1d0 mirror c7t2d0 c7t3d0 zfs create zfsatan/fs01 -bash-3.2# time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024x1024x1024 count=8 of=/zfsatan/ fs01/storfil 8+0 records in 8+0 records out real 2m58.863s user 0m0.001s sys 0m10.636s gives me for this run a 8192/17...

...0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0...

...Component: other AssignedTo: ajscarp at yahoo.com ReportedBy: darrenm at opensolaris.org QAContact: hua.tang at sun.com CC: zfs-crypto-discuss at opensolaris.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 # zpool create -f tank mirror c0t0d0 c0t1d0 log c7t0d0 cache c6t0d0 # zpool set keysource=raw,file:///root/tank.key tank Invalid keysource change. # zpool key -l tank Key Load Error: Invalid keysource property value. However if a keysource was set at pool creation ''zpool set'' can perform the valid changes. # pktool genkey keystore=file keytyp...

...c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors root at weyl:~# The first thing that''s jumping out at me: why does the first mirror think the missing disk was c7t0d0? I have an old zpool status from before the problem began, and that disk used to be c6t0d0. root at weyl:~# zpool status tank pool: tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t...

...STATE READ WRITE CKSUM thumper-9 DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0...

OK, I''ve been putting off this question for a while now, but it eating at me, so I can''t hold off any more. I have a nice 8 gig memory stick I''ve formated with the ZFS file system. Works great on all my Solaris PC''s, but refuses to work on my Sparc processor. So I''ve formated it on my Sparc machine (Blade 2500), works great there now, but not on

...0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0...

...NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors All went well until I tried pulling files from the server to another machine running 64bit Vista Ultimate SP1 via its build in NFS client. After copying cca. 100 of them (split archives all 1...

...t; chipool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t1d0 ONLINE...

...0374646305972114 state: FAULTED action: The pool cannot be imported due to damaged devices or data. config: tank UNAVAIL insufficient replicas raidz1 UNAVAIL corrupted data c0t0d0 ONLINE c1t0d0 ONLINE c4t0d0 ONLINE c6t0d0 ONLINE c7t0d0 ONLINE . . . .<snip>. . . . Booting again into the iso for 2008.05, zpool import showed the pool in degraded state. I was able to replace the failed disk with a spare, and then revert back to U5 and import the pool successfully, replace the spare with...

...c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ON...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

...NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zp1 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors to one of my external USB drives holding pool bup-wrack -bash-3.2$ zpool status bup-wrack pool: bup-wrack state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE RE...

I''m using Solaris 10u6 updated to u7 via patches, and I have a pool with a mirrored pair and a (shared) hot spare. We reconfigured disks a while ago and now the controller is c4 instead of c2. The hot spare was originally on c2, and apparently on rebooting it didn''t get found. So, I looked up what the new name for the hot spare was, then added it to the pool with "zpool