search for: c6e13d87

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "c6e13d87".

2015 Jan 15
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Integer Saturation Intrinsics
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 2:33 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk > wrote: > A couple of questions: > > 1) Should this really be an intrinsic and not a flag on add? The add > instruction already allows overflow to be either undefined or defined to > wrap. Making it defined to saturate seems a natural extension. > I don't think this should be a flag on