search for: c67xx

...c 450 2076854 2076854 nb_encode 50 71523682 1938067 fir_mem2 50 1777450 1777450 cheb_poly_eva 9634 1564172 1564172 lsp_weight_quant 100 1032600 1032600 Does this make sense? I'm generating floating point code, using the optimizer, etc... Has anyone posted DM642, C64xx or C67xx benchmarks?

Dear Sir I am a university student doing my dissertation, my project is about secure voice in GSM, and I use speex for speech compression. My problem is I am not able to compile the TI CCS project which I downloaded from the official website. I have followed the instruction to modify the directory in .pjt, but I still get error. I tried both Debug and Release mode neither works. the

...That's because some of the float ops get replaced by several int ops. > Does this make sense? > I'm generating floating point code, using the optimizer, etc... Are you sure the compiler isn't using float emulation or something like that? > Has anyone posted DM642, C64xx or C67xx benchmarks? I'm not aware of any. Jean-Marc

...That's because some of the float ops get replaced by several int ops. > Does this make sense? > I'm generating floating point code, using the optimizer, etc... Are you sure the compiler isn't using float emulation or something like that? > Has anyone posted DM642, C64xx or C67xx benchmarks? I'm not aware of any. Jean-Marc

Bryan, Someone else just had this problem compiling for the C67xx. The problem was caused by the EXPORT keyword that is present in some files in 1.2rc1, but not in 1.2beta3 (had been added in svn build 14797, April, 2008). To fix it, just add the line: "#define EXPORT" in ti/config.h. Jean-Marc, a patch is attached. - Jim ----- Original Mess...

.... That's because some of the float ops get replaced by several int ops. > Does this make sense? > I'm generating floating point code, using the optimizer, etc... Are you sure the compiler isn't using float emulation or something like that? > Has anyone posted DM642, C64xx or C67xx benchmarks? I'm not aware of any. Jean-Marc _______________________________________________ Speex-dev mailing list Speex-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev

.... That's because some of the float ops get replaced by several int ops. > Does this make sense? > I'm generating floating point code, using the optimizer, etc... Are you sure the compiler isn't using float emulation or something like that? > Has anyone posted DM642, C64xx or C67xx benchmarks? I'm not aware of any. Jean-Marc _______________________________________________ Speex-dev mailing list Speex-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev

Jean: The 6711 is actually a floating point processor so it can do the floating point without emulation. I am working on the 6416 which does not have it. Working with fixed point may still speed things up possibly. Muhammad: It seems like you might have to start getting into linear assembly to speed things up. If you are serious to getting speex working on TI DSP we should work together on

Hello! I'v downloaded speex lib 1.1.11.1. I am trying to port speex lib to Blackfin processor. I am using VisualDSP++ 4.0. If I am compiling source codes with using floating point everything ok. When I am compiling with FIXED_POINT defined everything's ok and code works about two times faster. But when I am defining BFIN_ASM I am getting several compiling errors in Blackfin assembler