search for: c620

...re? Since no one else chimed in, I did some googling, and it looks like someone has already filed a bug that looks pretty similar: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710123 <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710123> There is some advice there. It looks like the Intel C620 chipset is an intel ?fake? RAID controller, and I?d recommend you turn that off and use software RAID in the future. If you are a Red Hat customer, I definitely suggest filing a support request. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>

...a ISP2. This way ISP2 is only used when ISP1 is busy. I have no idea whether this is possible using 2.4 and advanced routing features. Or, whether it''s just a stupid idea. Anyone? -- Adrian Chung (adrian at enfusion-group dot com) http://www.enfusion-group.com/~adrian GPG Fingerprint: C620 C8EA 86BA 79CC 384C E7BE A10C 353B 919D 1A17 [toad.enfusion-group.com] up 8 days, 14:07, 17 users

...oogling, and it looks like > someone has already filed a bug that looks pretty similar: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710123 > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710123> > > > There is some advice there. > > > It looks like the Intel C620 chipset is an intel ???fake??? RAID > controller, and I???d recommend you turn that off and use software RAID > in the future. > > If you are a Red Hat customer, I definitely suggest filing a support > request. > Oh, the Intel fakeRAID. I started reading about that maybe 8 years a...

...m? I've turned the debug level up on winbind, and have some logs from a failure with the debug level up, but they're quite long. If they'd be helpful, I can post a URL. Thanks! -- Adrian Chung (adrian at enfusion-group dot com) http://www.enfusion-group.com/~adrian/ GPG Fingerprint: C620 C8EA 86BA 79CC 384C E7BE A10C 353B 919D 1A17 [gambit.enfusion-group.com] 8:38pm up 57 days, 22:15, 10 users

...t a red herring? I know that I can specify both servers in both my password server list and krb5.conf, but that's still no guarantee that they'll both pick the same server each time. -- Adrian Chung (adrian at enfusion-group dot com) http://www.enfusion-group.com/~adrian/ GPG Fingerprint: C620 C8EA 86BA 79CC 384C E7BE A10C 353B 919D 1A17 [gambit.enfusion-group.com] 9:03pm up 57 days, 22:40, 10 users

...LAN that''s crossing the VPN, and change the src IP in the packets to its own internal IP. It''s kernel 2.2.19, I believe (definitely a 2.2 series kernel). What am I missing? -- Adrian Chung (adrian at enfusion-group dot com) http://www.enfusion-group.com/~adrian GPG Fingerprint: C620 C8EA 86BA 79CC 384C E7BE A10C 353B 919D 1A17 [rogue.enfusion-group.com] 1:15am up 18 days, 6:35, 2 users

hi all, Iam using the following CBQs to limit the FTP bandwidth pease tell what changes are rquired to make it work.... tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1:0 cbq allot 1514 avpkt 1000 bandwidth 100Mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq allot 1514 bandwidth 100Mbit rate .4Mbit weight .4 prio 2 maxburst 20 cell 8 avpkt 1000 tc class add dev eth0

Hello ALL, is there a way to have a device independent qdisc, or a qdisc on some kind of virtuall interface? Background: I have a 5-Interface-Router with one Internet-Uplink. The Router should connect the clients on the other Interfaces to the Internet and to each other client. As i understood the hole TC stuff i can only get influence of outgoing traffic. In my case i can reduce the traffic of

Hello, Is it a Plan to correct the Broken mdadm and or driver for Intel Chipset C602, my Server SuperMicro Board X9SRi-F have a Problem with the new C8 or RH8 ? With C7 I can install Centos with no Problem? Have any a workaround or is it planed a Update for this Problem Thanks for a answer, -- mit freundlichen Gr?ssen / best regards, G?nther J. Niederwimmer

...te uid == 20007 At this point, I'm authenticated as the UNIX UID and have access via samba, but smbstatus shows the wrong username (the non-domain user). Anyone know how I can fix this? -- Adrian Chung (adrian at enfusion-group dot com) http://www.enfusion-group.com/~adrian/ GPG Fingerprint: C620 C8EA 86BA 79CC 384C E7BE A10C 353B 919D 1A17 [rogue.genosha.enfusion-group.com] 3:55pm up 4 days, 17:09, 3 users

...ENOSHA-DnsUpdateProxy GENOSHA-__vmware__ GENOSHA-Exchange Domain Servers GENOSHA-Exchange Enterprise Servers GENOSHA-_Web Anonymous Users GENOSHA-_Web Applications GENOSHA-IIS_WPG Any ideas? -- Adrian Chung (adrian at enfusion-group dot com) http://www.enfusion-group.com/~adrian/ GPG Fingerprint: C620 C8EA 86BA 79CC 384C E7BE A10C 353B 919D 1A17 [rogue.genosha.enfusion-group.com] 9:45am up 10 days, 7:56, 5 users

...y filed a bug that looks pretty similar: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710123 > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710123> > > > > > > There is some advice there. > > > > > > It looks like the Intel C620 chipset is an intel ???fake??? RAID > > controller, and I???d recommend you turn that off and use software RAID > > in the future. Yes, it is a "fake" raid Controller bat is not possible to found the drives in Raid Mode or AHCI Mode ? This Board have 2 Controller!? 00:1f.2...