Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "c606".
Did you mean:
606
2017 Jul 11
8
[LLD] Linker Relaxation
...< 100){
printf("%d\n", i);
}
return i;
}
int main(){
foo(10);
return 0;
}
After compiling to a .o with -O2 -march=RV32IC we get (just looking at foo)
00000000 <foo>:
0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16
2: c422 sw s0,8(sp)
4: c606 sw ra,12(sp)
6: 06300793 li a5,99
a: 842a mv s0,a0
c: 00a7cb63 blt a5,a0,22 <.L2>
10: 85aa mv a1,a0
12: 00000537 lui a0,0x0
16: 00050513 mv a0,a0
1a: 00000317 auipc t1,0x0
1e:...
2017 Jul 11
4
[LLD] Linker Relaxation
...foo(10);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> After compiling to a .o with -O2 -march=RV32IC we get (just looking at
>> foo)
>>
>> 00000000 <foo>:
>> 0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16
>> 2: c422 sw s0,8(sp)
>> 4: c606 sw ra,12(sp)
>> 6: 06300793 li a5,99
>> a: 842a mv s0,a0
>> c: 00a7cb63 blt a5,a0,22 <.L2>
>> 10: 85aa mv a1,a0
>> 12: 00000537 lui a0,0x0
>> 16: 00050513...
2017 Jul 11
2
[LLD] Linker Relaxation
Hi,
Does lld support linker relaxation that may shrink code size? As far
as I see lld seems to assume that the content of input sections to be
fixed other than patching up relocations, but I believe some targets
may benefit the extra optimization opportunity with relaxation.
Specifically, I'm currently working on adding support for RISC-V in
lld, and RISC-V heavily relies on linker relaxation
2012 Nov 30
2
"layout is NULL", "Failed to get node-uuid for [...] and other errors during rebalancing in 3.3.1
...Peer in Cluster (Connected)
>
> Hostname: ml31
> Uuid: 699019f6-2f4a-45cb-bfa4-f209745f8a6d
> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
>
> Hostname: ml29
> Uuid: 58aa8a16-5d2b-4c06-8f06-2fd0f7fc5a37
> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
>
> Hostname: ml53
> Uuid: 1dc6ee08-c606-4755-8756-b553f66efa88
> State: Peer in Cluster (Connected)
gluster version:
> glusterfs 3.3.1 built on Oct 11 2012 21:49:37
rpms:
> glusterfs.x86_64 3.3.1-1.el6 @glusterfs-epel
> glusterfs-debuginfo.x86_64 3.3.1-1.el6 @glusterfs-epel
> glusterfs-fuse.x86_...