search for: c5t7d0

...0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0...

...c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors sr1-uhou03-02% cat zpool_iostat_-v.out capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read write read...

If it''s of interest, I''ve written up some articles on my experiences of building a ZFS NAS box which you can read here: http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/ I used CIFS to share the filesystems, but it will be a simple matter to use NFS instead: issue the command ''zfs set sharenfs=on pool/filesystem'' instead of ''zfs set

...c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c4t1d0 AVAIL c4t2d0 INUSE currently in use errors: No known data errors In logs I keep getting: Apr 11 21:46:09 t...

Ciao, the rot filesystem of my thumper is a ZFS with a single disk: bash-3.2# zpool status rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c0t7d0 AVAIL c1t6d0 AVAIL c1t7d0

Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start: Status immediately after starting resilver: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine

...0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Thanks a lot Regards Sandro -- <http://www.sun...

...ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 .... c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c4t7d0 INUSE currently in use c5t7d0 AVAIL am I supposed to do something with c1t3d0 now? Thanks, Tony Schreiner Boston College

...c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c8t1d0 INUSE currently in use errors: No known data errors -- Stuart Anderson ander...

...t; c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > spares > > c4t4d0 AVAIL > > c7t4d0 AVAIL

...-vdev0 > state: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > thumper1-vdev0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > c8t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > The first thing is that for this pool I was expecting 200-300MB/...

...c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ON...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.