search for: c5t6d0

...ULTED corrupted data c4t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c5t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c6t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c6t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data spare DEGRADED c7t2d0 UNAVAIL cannot open c5t6d0 ONLINE c7t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data Is it possible to get rid of this without destroying the whole pool and recreating it? I would like to add c5t2d0 c5t6d0 to the actual zpool as hotspares, but I can''t: bash-3.00# zpool add data1 spare c5t2d0 c5t6d0 invalid vdev spec...

Hi all, I recently created a RAID-Z1 pool out of a set of 7 SCSI disks, using the following command: # zpool create magicant raidz c5t0d0 c5t1d0 c5t2d0 c5t3d0 c5t4d0 c5t5d0 c5t6d0 It worked fine, but I was slightly confused by the size yield (99 GB vs the 116 GB I had on my other RAID-Z1 pool of same-sized disks). I thought one of the disks might have been to blame, so I tried swapping it out - it turned out my replacement disk was a dud (zpool wasn''t happy about...

...0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0...

...c2t18d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t20d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t21d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t19d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c2t22d0 AVAIL errors: No known data errors Suppose I want to power down the disks c2t19d0 and c5...

...c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE...

...LINE 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 replacing DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t6d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0...

Ciao, the rot filesystem of my thumper is a ZFS with a single disk: bash-3.2# zpool status rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c0t7d0 AVAIL c1t6d0 AVAIL c1t7d0

Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start: Status immediately after starting resilver: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine

...c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 .... c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c4t7d0 INUSE currently in use c5t7d0 AVAIL am I supposed to do something with c1t3d0 now? Thanks, Tony Schreiner Boston College

...c8t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 spare DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t6d0 OFFLINE 0 0 0 c8t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ON...

...t; c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t7d0 ONLINE...

...c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 *** c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ON...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

This must be resliver day :) I just had a drive failure. The hot spare kicked in, and access to the pool over NFS was effectively zero for about 45 minutes. Currently the pool is still reslivering, but for some reason I can access the file system now. Resliver speed has been beaten to death I know, but is there a way to avoid this? For example, is more enterprisy hardware less susceptible to

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.