search for: c5t5d0

...c5t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t21d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t19d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c2t22d0 AVAIL errors: No known data errors Suppose I want to power down the disks c2t19d0 and c5t5d0 because they are not needed. One can easily picture a thumper with many disks unused and see reasons why one would want to power off disks....

Hi all, I recently created a RAID-Z1 pool out of a set of 7 SCSI disks, using the following command: # zpool create magicant raidz c5t0d0 c5t1d0 c5t2d0 c5t3d0 c5t4d0 c5t5d0 c5t6d0 It worked fine, but I was slightly confused by the size yield (99 GB vs the 116 GB I had on my other RAID-Z1 pool of same-sized disks). I thought one of the disks might have been to blame, so I tried swapping it out - it turned out my replacement disk was a dud (zpool wasn''t happy...

...0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0...

...c6t4d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE...

...c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 replac...

Ciao, the rot filesystem of my thumper is a ZFS with a single disk: bash-3.2# zpool status rpool pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c0t7d0 AVAIL c1t6d0 AVAIL c1t7d0

Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start: Status immediately after starting resilver: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine

...0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0...

...c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 spare DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t6d0 OF...

...t; c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t6d0 ONLINE...

...- card1 ("c3") - bp1 (c3t0d0, c3t1d0) - bp2 (c3t4d0, c3t5d0) - card2 ("c4") - bp1 (c4t0d0, c4t1d0) - bp2 (c4t4d0, c4t5d0) - card3 ("c5") - bp1 (c5t0d0, c5t1d0) - bp2 (c5t4d0, c5t5d0) - system has one Barcelona Opteron (step BA) - the one with the potential look-aside cache bug... - though its not clear this is related... My First Thought To Debugging This ------------------------------------------------ After crashing my system several times (using `...

...c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ** Heres the resilver...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the MB/s range during a scrub). Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages. Load on the box is .59. 8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.

...VEs with ZFS RAIDZ1 configuration. I shared the zfs partitions and mounted them on VMWare. Everything is great till I have to write to the disks. It won''t write! Steps I took creating the disks 1) Installed mega_sas drivers. 2) zpool create tank raidz c5t0d0 c5t1d0 c5t2d0 c5t3d0 c5t4d0 c5t5d0 3) zfs create -V 1TB tank/disk1 4) zfs create -V 1TB tank/disk2 5) iscsitadm create target -b /dev/zvol/rdsk/tank/disk1 LABEL1 6) iscsitadm create target -b /dev/zvol/rdsk/tank/disk2 LABEL2 Now both drives are lun 0 but with uniqu VMHBA device identifiers. SO they are detected as seperate drives....

Hello. We''re currently using a Sun Blade1000 (2x750MHz, 1G ram, 2x160MB/s mpt scsi buses, skge GigE network) as a NFS backend with ZFS for distribution of free software like Debian (cdimage.debian.org, ftp.se.debian.org) and have run into some performance issues. We are running SX snv_48 and have run with a raidz2 with 7x300G for a while now, just added another 7x300G raidz2 today but