search for: c5t1d0

Hi all, I recently created a RAID-Z1 pool out of a set of 7 SCSI disks, using the following command: # zpool create magicant raidz c5t0d0 c5t1d0 c5t2d0 c5t3d0 c5t4d0 c5t5d0 c5t6d0 It worked fine, but I was slightly confused by the size yield (99 GB vs the 116 GB I had on my other RAID-Z1 pool of same-sized disks). I thought one of the disks might have been to blame, so I tried swapping it out - it turned out my replacement disk was a dud...

...ADED 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 5.56M resilvered replacing DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t2d0s0/o FAULTED 1.71M 23.3M 0 too many errors c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 5.43M resilvered c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 5.55M resilvered And a few minutes later: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine if...

...00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3124 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial ATA Controller pci bus 0x0088 cardnum 0x01 function 0x00: vendor 0x1095 device 0x3124 Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3124 PCI-X Serial ATA Controller c5*, c6* and c7* are the eSATA disks. zpool create -f zfsatan mirror c5t0d0 c5t1d0 mirror c5t2d0 c5t3d0 mirror c6t0d0 c6t1d0 mirror c6t2d0 c6t3d0 mirror c7t0d0 c7t1d0 mirror c7t2d0 c7t3d0 zfs create zfsatan/fs01 -bash-3.2# time dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024x1024x1024 count=8 of=/zfsatan/ fs01/storfil 8+0 records in 8+0 records out real 2m58.863s user 0m0.001s sys 0m10....

...0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0...

...NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM array03 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t16d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t17d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t18d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t20d0 ONLINE...

...c6t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0s6 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE...

...GRADED 0 0 0 mirror DEGRADED 0 0 0 7508645614192559694 FAULTED 0 0 0 was /dev/dsk/c7t0d0s0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 6 21.2G resilvered c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors root at weyl:~# The first thing that''s jumping out at me: why does the first mirror think the missing disk was c7t0d0? I have an old zpool s...

...c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0...

...0 0 0 c6t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 ** Heres the resilver spare ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 18 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 *** c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0...

...of ../common/libzfs_pool.c ********* reply to customer ******************** It looks like you have an additional unwanted software layer between Solaris and the disk hardware. Currently ZFS needs to access the physical device to work correctly. Something like: # zpool create -f extdisk c5t0d0 c5t1d0 ...... Let me know if this works for you. ************* follow-up question from customer ************ Yes, using the c#t#d# disks work, but anyone using fibre-channel storage on somethink like IBM Shark or EMC Clariion will want multiple paths to disk using either IBMsdd, EMCpower or Solaris nat...

...0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0...

Hello, I was hoping that this would work: http://blogs.sun.com/zhangfan/entry/how_to_turn_a_mirror I have 4x(1TB) disks, one of which is filled with 800GB of data (that I cant delete/backup somewhere else) > root at FSK-Backup:~# zpool create -f ambry raidz1 c4t0d0 c5t0d0 c5t1d0 > /dev/lofi/1 > root at FSK-Backup:~# zpool list > NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT > ambry 592G 132K 592G 0% ONLINE - I get this (592GB???) I bring the virtual device offline, and it becomes degraded, yet I wont be able to copy my data over. I was wonder...

...bash-3.2# zpool status -v tank pool: tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors All went well until I tried pulling files from the server to another machine running 64bit Vist...

...c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ON...

...t; c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t2d0 ONLINE...

...ged into 6 mini-sas backplanes - card1 ("c3") - bp1 (c3t0d0, c3t1d0) - bp2 (c3t4d0, c3t5d0) - card2 ("c4") - bp1 (c4t0d0, c4t1d0) - bp2 (c4t4d0, c4t5d0) - card3 ("c5") - bp1 (c5t0d0, c5t1d0) - bp2 (c5t4d0, c5t5d0) - system has one Barcelona Opteron (step BA) - the one with the potential look-aside cache bug... - though its not clear this is related... My First Thought To Debugging This ------------------------------------------------ After crashi...

Hello, Due to a power outage our file server running FreeBSD 8.0p2 will no longer come up due to zpool corruption. I get the following output when trying to import the ZFS pool using either a FreeBSD 8.0p2 cd or the latest OpenSolaris snv_143 cd: FreeBSD mfsbsd 8.0-RELEASE-p2.vx.sk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 mfsbsd# zpool import pool: tank id: 1998957762692994918 state: FAULTED

...* compress / copies = 7.51 However, after zpool and zfs upgrades *on both machines*, they still say the rpool is version 22. Is that expected/correct? I added a new virtual disk to the vm weston to see what would happen if I made a new pool on the new disk. chris at weston:~# zpool create test c5t1d0 Well, the new "test" pool shows version 27, but rpool is still listed at 22 by zdb. Is this expected /correct behavior? See the output below to see the rpool and test pool version numbers according to zdb on the host weston. Can anyone provide any insight into what I''m seein...

...* compress / copies = 7.51 However, after zpool and zfs upgrades *on both machines*, they still say the rpool is version 22. Is that expected/correct? I added a new virtual disk to the vm weston to see what would happen if I made a new pool on the new disk. chris at weston:~# zpool create test c5t1d0 Well, the new "test" pool shows version 27, but rpool is still listed at 22 by zdb. Is this expected /correct behavior? See the output below to see the rpool and test pool version numbers according to zdb on the host weston. Can anyone provide any insight into what I''m seein...

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would