Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "c55283f0".
2014 Sep 09
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-RT] [ARM] Where __aeabi_[il]div0 builtins should be implemented?
...ome other value?
>
> Because 0 is what it was before.
>
> cheers,
> --renato
>
--
Saleem Abdulrasool
compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140908/c55283f0/attachment.html>
2014 Sep 08
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-RT] [ARM] Where __aeabi_[il]div0 builtins should be implemented?
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
wrote:
> On 6 September 2014 22:46, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org>
> wrote:
> > I did dig into this further and it seems that they are, in fact,
> considered
> > part of the RT-ABI :-(. Ive committed a simple conforming
> implementation in
> > SVN r217322.
>
>