search for: c53812ba

> For the windows sub-target is it safe to assume Microsoft's linker is the being targeted? I'd really appreciate if both ms link and gnu ld will be tested, if this is possible. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

On 11 May 2010 18:04, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > For the windows sub-target is it safe to assume Microsoft's linker is the > being targeted? > I'd really appreciate if both ms link and gnu ld will be tested, if > this is possible. I have done some tests with Cygwin, and most things seem okay, e.g. Static Constructors...Virtual

...e subtarget was their to differentiate what tool-set was being targeted. I used that assumption on my patch to update the support for dllexport. -Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100511/c53812ba/attachment.html>