Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "c4t7d0".
Did you mean:
c0t7d0
2010 Nov 23
1
drive replaced from spare
I have a x4540 with a single pool made from a bunch of raidz1''s with
2 spares (solaris 10 u7). Been running great for over a year, but
I''ve had my first event.
A day ago the system activated one of the spares c4t7d0, but given the
status below, I''m not sure what to do next.
# zpool status
pool: pool1
state: ONLINE
scrub: resilver completed after 2h25m with 0 errors on Mon Nov 22
14:25:12 2010
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0
rai...
2006 Oct 24
3
determining raidz pool configuration
...0
c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0...
2008 Apr 11
0
How to replace root drive if ZFS data is on it?
...c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
sr1-uhou03-02% cat zpool_iostat_-v.out
capacity operations bandwidth
p...
2007 Apr 11
0
raidz2 another resilver problem
...c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
c4t1d0 AVAIL
c4t2d0 INUSE currently in use
errors: No known data e...
2009 Jul 13
7
OpenSolaris 2008.11 - resilver still restarting
Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start:
Status immediately after starting resilver:
# zpool status
pool: rc-pool
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected.
action: Determine
2008 Apr 02
1
delete old zpool config?
...0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
Than...
2009 Jan 13
12
OpenSolaris better Than Solaris10u6 with requards to ARECA Raid Card
...raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t11d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t12d0 ONLINE...
2010 Dec 05
4
Zfs ignoring spares?
...c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-6 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t11d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t12d...
2010 May 28
21
expand zfs for OpenSolaris running inside vm
hello, all
I am have constraint disk space (only 8GB) while running os inside vm. Now i
want to add more. It is easy to add for vm but how can i update fs in os?
I cannot use autoexpand because it doesn''t implemented in my system:
$ uname -a
SunOS sopen 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc
If it was 171 it would be grate, right?
Doing following:
o added new virtual HDD (it becomes
2008 Mar 12
3
Mixing RAIDZ and RAIDZ2 zvols in the same zpool
...t; c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> spares
>
> c4t4d0 AVAIL
>
> c7t4d0 AVAIL
2009 Jun 19
8
x4500 resilvering spare taking forever?
...c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t3d0 ON...
2007 Feb 27
16
understanding zfs/thunoer "bottlenecks"?
Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance.
I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.).
According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would
2007 Oct 08
16
Fileserver performance tests
...bods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following:
[i]zpool create zfs_raid10_16_disks mirror c3t0d0 c4t0d0 mirror c3t1d0 c4t1d0 mirror c3t2d0 c4t2d0 mirror c3t3d0 c4t3d0 mirror c3t4d0 c4t4d0 mirror c3t5d0 c4t5d0 mirror c3t6d0 c4t6d0 mirror c3t7d0 c4t7d0[/i]
the i set "noatime" and ran the following filebench tests:
[i]
root at sun1 # ./filebench
filebench> load fileserver
12746: 7.445: FileServer Version 1.14 2005/06/21 21:18:52 personality successfully loaded
12746: 7.445: Usage: set $dir=<dir>
12746: 7.445: set $fil...