search for: c4t3d0

...raidz1 UNAVAIL insufficient replicas c0t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c0t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c1t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c1t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c4t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c4t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c5t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data c6t2d0 FAULTED corrupted data c6t3d0 FAULTED corrupted data spare DEGRADED c7t2d0 UNAVAIL cannot open c5t6d0 ONLINE c7t3d0 FAUL...

Hi, once I created a zpool of single vdevs not using mirroring of any kind. Now I wonder if it''s possible to add vdevs and mirror the currently existing ones. Thanks, budy -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

...0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t2d0 ONLINE 0...

...s on Mon Nov 24 20:06:48 2008 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypooladas DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open c4t9d0 ONLINE 0 0...

...c5t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0s3 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0s3 ONLINE...

...c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0...

Just look at this. I thought all the restarting resilver bugs were fixed, but it looks like something odd is still happening at the start: Status immediately after starting resilver: # zpool status pool: rc-pool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine

...raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 .... c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c4t7d0 INUSE currently in use c5t7d0 AVAIL am I supposed to do so...

...root at yoda:~/bin# zpool status pool: backup state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM backup ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE...

...c8t34d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c8t35d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-5 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-6 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t8d0...

hello, all I am have constraint disk space (only 8GB) while running os inside vm. Now i want to add more. It is easy to add for vm but how can i update fs in os? I cannot use autoexpand because it doesn''t implemented in my system: $ uname -a SunOS sopen 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc If it was 171 it would be grate, right? Doing following: o added new virtual HDD (it becomes

...t; c6t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c0t5d0 ONLINE...

...c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c5t1d0 INUSE currently in use...

(i use the term loosely because i know that zfs likes whole volumes better) when installing ubuntu, i got in the habit of using a separate partition for my home directory so that my data and gnome settings would all remain intact when i reinstalled or upgraded. i''m running osol 2008.11 on an ultra 20, which has only two drives. i''ve got all my data located in my home directory,

Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance. I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.). According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would

...laris 10 on a x4200 with 8gig of ram and two Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following: [i]zpool create zfs_raid10_16_disks mirror c3t0d0 c4t0d0 mirror c3t1d0 c4t1d0 mirror c3t2d0 c4t2d0 mirror c3t3d0 c4t3d0 mirror c3t4d0 c4t4d0 mirror c3t5d0 c4t5d0 mirror c3t6d0 c4t6d0 mirror c3t7d0 c4t7d0[/i] the i set "noatime" and ran the following filebench tests: [i] root at sun1 # ./filebench filebench> load fileserver 12746: 7.445: FileServer Version 1.14 2005/06/21 21:18:52 personality success...

Hello. We''re currently using a Sun Blade1000 (2x750MHz, 1G ram, 2x160MB/s mpt scsi buses, skge GigE network) as a NFS backend with ZFS for distribution of free software like Debian (cdimage.debian.org, ftp.se.debian.org) and have run into some performance issues. We are running SX snv_48 and have run with a raidz2 with 7x300G for a while now, just added another 7x300G raidz2 today but