Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "c4d66650".
Did you mean:
466650
2016 Dec 29
0
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
Dave pointed out that I didn't complete one aspect of my argument on the
push_back vs. emplace_back:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 2:04 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Still another way to see the consequence of this is to look at the nature
> of compiler errors when a programmer makes a mistake.
>
> With emplace_back, if you fail to call the constructor
2016 Dec 30
2
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
...__________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161230/c4d66650/attachment.html>