search for: c4d66650

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "c4d66650".

Did you mean: 466650
2016 Dec 29
0
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
Dave pointed out that I didn't complete one aspect of my argument on the push_back vs. emplace_back: On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 2:04 PM Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > Still another way to see the consequence of this is to look at the nature > of compiler errors when a programmer makes a mistake. > > With emplace_back, if you fail to call the constructor
2016 Dec 30
2
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
...__________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161230/c4d66650/attachment.html>