Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "c4ac389".
Did you mean:
c4ac389e
2011 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] Changes to the PTX calling conventions
...whatever form the target
OpenCL run-time expects.
This is a question for cfe-dev.
>
>
> --
> Pekka
>
--
Thanks,
Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111214/c4ac389e/attachment.html>
2011 Dec 14
2
[LLVMdev] Changes to the PTX calling conventions
On 12/14/2011 02:41 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote:
> I would favor calling conventions over metadata for the simple reason
> that this maps more cleanly to the device model. Device and kernel
> functions are represented differently in PTX, including (sometimes) the
> way parameters are passed.
For the record, marking the kernels with "calling conventions" instead
of metadata