Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "c47884a".
Did you mean:
478848
2014 Jun 12
0
Re: a small problem about *Disk* type pool
...gt;
| > There is a small problem about *Disk* type pool.
|
| This sort of question might be better on the libvirt-users mailing list,
| as it will reach a wider audience.
|
| >
| > On libvirt.org, the valid pool format type include "lvm2", which was
| > introduce by commit c47884a. While "POOL_DISK_LVM2 can not be created by
| > "parted mklabel" but is only returned from auto-detection on disk
| > pools", should this word be added to the org in case of misleading
| > building a "lvm2" type pool?
|
| Yes, it might make sense to document...