search for: c4758600

On May 8, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > What are the SHA-3 variants that you think would suite these needs ? > > I want to look at the implementation complexity. The winner (and the official SHA3 algorithm), BMW and Skein are all worth looking at. If your primary criterion is through-put on large, desktop-class CPUs, Skein is likely

...BMW had a significantly higher throughput in software, and was only disqualified due to fairly long-tail security concerns that wouldn't apply here. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130508/c4758600/attachment.html>

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org > > wrote: > >> On 5/8/2013 11:35 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> >>> Interestingly newer, supposedly "more secure" digest algorithms are also >>> very often significantly faster. I