Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "c4519".
Did you mean:
14519
2014 Aug 22
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Raising LLVM minimum required MSVC version to 2013 for trunk
Starting a new thread to loop in cfe-dev and lldb-dev. For those not following along there has been a thread on llvm-dev about moving the minimum required Visual Studio version to 2013. The motivating reason is this will allow us to take advantage of a bunch of C++11 features that are not supported by MSVC 2012. According to MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx) the list is:
2014 Sep 30
4
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] Raising LLVM minimum required MSVC version to 2013 for trunk
...tly relying on. We made some changes to ASTMatchers
> to reduce the number of symbols generated in order to not require
> /bigobj support (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D5485). This change
> relies on function templates with default arguments, which MSVC does
> not support (it generates a C4519 error in MSVC 2012), resulting in
> red bots (http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-clang-i686-msc17-
> R/builds/10721).
I have a sad bot failing to build in Debug mode, glad to know there's
a fix in the works.
>
> This is a considerably more interesting case (at least to me) than
>...