search for: c3t2d0

Hi, once I created a zpool of single vdevs not using mirroring of any kind. Now I wonder if it''s possible to add vdevs and mirror the currently existing ones. Thanks, budy -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

...v wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 335.0 0.0 0.0 0 100 md/d30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 335.0 0.0 0.0 0 100 md/d40 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 335.0 0.0 0.0 0 100 md/d52 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 334.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 100 100 c3t2d0 cpu us sy wt id 10 5 0 85 extended device statistics r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 335.0 0.0 0.0 0 100 md/d30 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 335.0 0.0 0.0 0 100 md/d40 0.0...

...0.1 0.0 18.6 8.3 1 2 c0d0 3.9 0.6 220.9 57.9 0.0 0.0 5.6 1.2 0 0 c6d1 8.1 0.0 456.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0 0 c3t0d0 12.8 0.0 717.7 0.0 5.5 0.2 433.1 14.6 18 19 c3t1d0 4.9 0.0 279.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0 0 c3t2d0 4.9 0.0 279.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.6 0 0 c3t3d0 c0d0 is the rpool. c6d1 is a 1.5TB drive connected to a Sil3114 controller (backup1 pool) c3t0-c3t3 are the 4 x 750GB drives connected to the motherboard ports. As you can see from the iostat above, c3t1d0 is acting differently....

...NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 We found that pool1 is more slow than pool2, even with the same number of disk...

...tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors root at mosasaur:/# zfs get all tank NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE tank type filesystem - tank creation Sat Jul 12 22:47 2008 - tank used 30.7G - tank availabl...

...tank state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors root at mosasaur:/# zfs get all tank NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE tank type filesystem - tank creation Sat Jul 12 22:47 2008 - tank used 30.7G - tank availabl...

...from zpool''s iostat: capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- vdatapool 79.8G 848G 0 124 0 15.6M mirror 39.9G 424G 0 62 0 7.80M c3t2d0 - - 0 62 0 7.80M c3t3d0 - - 0 62 0 7.80M mirror 39.9G 424G 0 62 0 7.80M c3t4d0 - - 0 62 0 7.80M c3t5d0 - - 0 62 0 7.80M ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----...

...write read write ----------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- zpool 930G 566G 16 114 41.5K 915K raidz1 631G 185G 11 71 30.9K 573K c3t0d0 - - 0 38 38.8K 120K c3t1d0 - - 0 42 38.8K 115K c3t2d0 - - 0 44 49.9K 120K c3t3d0 - - 0 43 33.3K 115K c3t4d0 - - 0 41 44.4K 120K c3t5d0 - - 0 43 38.8K 114K raidz1 299G 381G 5 42 10.5K 341K c3t8d0 - - 0...

...CKSUM data DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t0d0 UNAVAIL 0...

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

hello, all I am have constraint disk space (only 8GB) while running os inside vm. Now i want to add more. It is easy to add for vm but how can i update fs in os? I cannot use autoexpand because it doesn''t implemented in my system: $ uname -a SunOS sopen 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc If it was 171 it would be grate, right? Doing following: o added new virtual HDD (it becomes

...AD WRITE CKSUM > > : > pptank ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : > raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : > c3t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : > c3t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : > c3t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : > c3t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : > c3t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : > c3t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : > c3t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > : &gt...

...e. I installed the latest Solaris 10 on a x4200 with 8gig of ram and two Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following: [i]zpool create zfs_raid10_16_disks mirror c3t0d0 c4t0d0 mirror c3t1d0 c4t1d0 mirror c3t2d0 c4t2d0 mirror c3t3d0 c4t3d0 mirror c3t4d0 c4t4d0 mirror c3t5d0 c4t5d0 mirror c3t6d0 c4t6d0 mirror c3t7d0 c4t7d0[/i] the i set "noatime" and ran the following filebench tests: [i] root at sun1 # ./filebench filebench> load fileserver 12746: 7.445: FileServer Version 1.14 2005/06/21...

...IW, format reports the xraid disks as: 2. c3t0d0 <APPLE-Xserve RAID-1.50-2.73TB> /pci at 0,0/pci1022,7450 at b/pci1000,1010 at 1,1/sd at 0,0 3. c3t1d0 <APPLE-Xserve RAID-1.50-2.73TB> /pci at 0,0/pci1022,7450 at b/pci1000,1010 at 1,1/sd at 1,0 4. c3t2d0 <APPLE-Xserve RAID-1.26-745.21GB> /pci at 0,0/pci1022,7450 at b/pci1000,1010 at 1,1/sd at 2,0 Is there anybody here who''s using ZFS on Apple XRaids and serving them via NFS? Does anybody have any other ideas what I could do to solve this? (I have, in the mean time, conve...