Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "c2t6d0".
Did you mean:
c0t6d0
2006 Nov 01
0
RAID-Z1 pool became faulted when a disk was removed.
...-8000-5E
config:
moonside FAULTED corrupted data
raidz1 FAULTED corrupted data
c2t0d0 ONLINE
c2t1d0 ONLINE
c2t2d0 ONLINE
c2t3d0 ONLINE
c2t4d0 FAULTED corrupted data
c2t5d0 ONLINE
c2t6d0 ONLINE
Thanks, ZFS. One disk (at most, one disk and attempting to use a different
SCSI connector) blew up my RAID-Z1. That''s...wonderful.
I try rebooting to see if it becomes less confused...
pool: moonside
id: 8290331144559232496
state: FAULTED
status: One or more devices are m...
2008 Jan 31
16
Hardware RAID vs. ZFS RAID
Hello,
I have a Dell 2950 with a Perc 5/i, two 300GB 15K SAS drives in a RAID0 array. I am considering going to ZFS and I would like to get some feedback about which situation would yield the highest performance: using the Perc 5/i to provide a hardware RAID0 that is presented as a single volume to OpenSolaris, or using the drives separately and creating the RAID0 with OpenSolaris and ZFS? Or
2007 Oct 12
0
zfs: allocating allocated segment(offset=77984887808 size=66560)
...9;zpool upgrade''.
config:
z ONLINE
raidz1 ONLINE
c1t1d0 ONLINE
c2t1d0 ONLINE
c1t6d0 ONLINE
c1t4d0 ONLINE
c2t3d0 ONLINE
raidz1 ONLINE
c2t4d0 ONLINE
c2t6d0 ONLINE
c1t3d0 ONLINE
c2t5d0 ONLINE
c1t5d0 ONLINE
ssh access available.
how does one free segment(offset=77984887808 size=66560)
on a pool that won''t import?
2007 Aug 30
15
ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 compared
I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days,
and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based
entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of
ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for
years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom:
2009 Jan 13
12
OpenSolaris better Than Solaris10u6 with requards to ARECA Raid Card
...CKSUM
backup ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 5 0
c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 1 0
c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 1 0
c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 2 0
c2t6d0 ONLINE 0 2 0
c2t7d0 ONLINE 0 2 0
c2t8d0 ONLINE 0 3 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c2t9d0 ONLINE 0 2 0
c2t10d0 ONLINE 0 2 0
c2t11d0 ONLINE 0...
2009 Mar 28
53
Can this be done?
I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1.
I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1
Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two
raid5''s striped (in raid terms?)
Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running
snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110.
If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command
lines to