search for: c2t4d0

...nutes to give me console login. Commands took at least 5s between being typed and appearing in console - it was obvious something insane was going on. Load average was 6.33, and fmd was taking most of the CPU. zpool status took about 10 minutes to tell me that it thought c2t2d0 was missing and that c2t4d0 was corrupt, thereby screwing me. Wait, what. I didn''t touch that disk, what''s going on here. I try to convince ZFS that the disk is there and usable via zpool online moonside c2t2d0, but it just claims the pool is inaccessable (great, thanks ZFS). I figure it has to be the modu...

...CKSUM data DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c5d1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors pjjw at push:~$ sudo format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c0d0 <DEFAULT cyl 24318 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci-ide at 8/ide at 0/cmdk at 0,0 1. c0d1 <ST320082...

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

Hi there, i''m building a small NAS with 5x1TB Disks. The disks contains at the moment some data, ntfs as the fs and aren''t a raid. Now my im wondering if its possible to add the parity later. So that i add step by step one disk to the pool. And when i add the last disk, i enable the parity. (i have only one another 1 tb disk to backup the files) Thank you for you replies and

...9;zpool online''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-D3 scrub: resilver completed with 0 errors on Mon Jan 8 15:56:20 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM pool01 DEGRADED 0 0 0 mirror DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t8d0 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c3t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c2t8d0 AVAIL c3t10d0 AVAIL...

Hello, I have a Dell 2950 with a Perc 5/i, two 300GB 15K SAS drives in a RAID0 array. I am considering going to ZFS and I would like to get some feedback about which situation would yield the highest performance: using the Perc 5/i to provide a hardware RAID0 that is presented as a single volume to OpenSolaris, or using the drives separately and creating the RAID0 with OpenSolaris and ZFS? Or

...0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz DEGRADED 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 UNAVAIL 42 63 0 cannot open errors: No known data errors And below is some info from /var/adm/messages: Aug 29 12:42:08 localhost marvell88sx: [ID 812917 kern.warning] WARNING: marvell88sx1: error on port 5: Aug 29 12:42:08 localhost m...

...M rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: solaris state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM solaris ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0...

...without an explicit ''zpool upgrade''. config: z ONLINE raidz1 ONLINE c1t1d0 ONLINE c2t1d0 ONLINE c1t6d0 ONLINE c1t4d0 ONLINE c2t3d0 ONLINE raidz1 ONLINE c2t4d0 ONLINE c2t6d0 ONLINE c1t3d0 ONLINE c2t5d0 ONLINE c1t5d0 ONLINE ssh access available. how does one free segment(offset=77984887808 size=66560) on a pool that won''t import?

...raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 Internal SATA on left side c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 Internal SATA on right side c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 External SATA disk 1 in box on top c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 External SATA disk 2 in box on top spares c2t5d0 AVAIL External SATA disk 3 in box on top errors: No known data errors The above would be very useful should a disk fail to identify what device is what. Thanks! ----...

I have a lot of people whispering "zfs" in my virtual ear these days, and at the same time I have an irrational attachment to xfs based entirely on its lack of the 32000 subdirectory limit. I''m not afraid of ext4''s newness, since really a lot of that stuff has been in Lustre for years. So a-benchmarking I went. Results at the bottom:

...m with 0 errors on Fri Jan 9 09:57:46 2009 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM backup ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t2d0 ONLINE 0 5 0 c2t3d0 ONLINE 0 1 0 c2t4d0 ONLINE 0 1 0 c2t5d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t6d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t7d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t8d0 ONLINE 0 3 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t9d0 ONLINE 0...

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface

I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1. I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1 Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two raid5''s striped (in raid terms?) Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110. If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command lines to