search for: c2t13d0

1. I have a 4x18GB drive setup as RAIDZ. Now when thinking about it in terms of RAID5 I would expect to get (4-1)x18 worth of drive space, but DF -h shows 4x18. Is this a bug or do I not understand? 2. Once again thinking in RAID5 terms if I have 4X18GB and 12X9GB drives and I want to make a RAIDZ of all of them I would expect the 18GB to be treated at 9GB so the RAIDZ would be 16X9GB. Is

...z1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t11d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t13d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t12d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t13d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t10d0...

I physically removed a disk (c3t8d0 used by ZFS ''pool01'') from a 3310 JBOD connected to a V210 running s10u3 (11/06) and ''zpool status'' reported this: # zpool status pool: pool01 state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be opened. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Attach the

...0 c2t8d0 ONLINE 0 3 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t9d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t10d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t11d0 ONLINE 0 3 0 c2t12d0 ONLINE 0 3 0 c2t13d0 ONLINE 0 3 0 c2t14d0 ONLINE 0 2 0 c2t15d0 ONLINE 0 51 0 errors: No known data errors pool: rpool state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error....

I currently have a 7x1.5tb raidz1. I want to add "phase 2" which is another 7x1.5tb raidz1 Can I add the second phase to the first phase and basically have two raid5''s striped (in raid terms?) Yes, I probably should upgrade the zpool format too. Currently running snv_104. Also should upgrade to 110. If that is possible, would anyone happen to have the simple command lines to