search for: c2c36806

...ou added those unconditionally anyway; we can choose to support them or not. And hopefully if GCC did the same, then again the thunk symbols would match. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180206/c2c36806/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5213 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180206/c2c36806/attachment.bin>

So, I was waiting to hear a definitive response on whether using aliases is hard, and didn't see one here, which is why I haven't responded further. However, a colleauge pointed me at an LKML thread where it seems there *is* a definitive response? I'm really looking for clear direction: we can try to implement custom naming, but it will add undesirable complexity to the compiler. Do