search for: c221cfc2

What’s wrong with reverse proxying icecast through apache? In my case, it’s just a measure to allow a secondary point of access to a stream from public wifi that only allows ports 80 and 443. Is it just a potential resource usage implication? > On Apr 7, 2019, at 6:12 PM, Humberto Rodriguez <sub at hrfinancial.com> wrote: > > Why not reproduce the stream using the <audio>

...t; _______________________________________________ > Icecast mailing list > Icecast at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20190408/c221cfc2/attachment.html>