Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "c1t7d0".
Did you mean:
c1t0d0
2008 Jul 02
14
is it possible to add a mirror device later?
...atus rpool
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
rpool ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
c0t7d0 AVAIL
c1t6d0 AVAIL
c1t7d0 AVAIL
is it possible to add a mirror to it? I seem to be able only to add a
new PAIR of disks in mirror, but not to add a mirror to the existing
disk ...
thanks
tommaso
Tommaso Boccali - CMS Experiment - INFN Pisa
iChat/AIM/Skype/Gizmo: tomboc73
Mail: mailto:tommas...
2008 Jul 28
1
zpool status my_pool , shows a pulled disk c1t6d0 as ONLINE ???
New server build with Solaris-10 u5/08,
on a SunFire t5220, and this is our first rollout of ZFS and Zpools.
Have 8 disks, boot disk is hardware mirrored (c1t0d0 + c1t1d0)
Created Zpool my_pool as RaidZ using 5 disks + 1 spare:
c1t2d0, c1t3d0, c1t4d0, c1t5d0, c1t6d0, and spare c1t7d0
I am working on alerting & recovery plans for disks failures in the zpool.
As a test, I have pulled disk c1t6d0, to see what a disk failure will look like.
"zpool status -v mypool" Still reports disk c1t6d0 as ONLINE.
"iostat -En" also does not yet realize that the disk is...
2006 Oct 24
3
determining raidz pool configuration
...0
c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t5d0 ONLINE 0...
2008 Apr 11
0
How to replace root drive if ZFS data is on it?
...c4t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
sr1-uhou03-02% cat zpool_iostat_-v.out...
2007 Jan 11
4
Help understanding some benchmark results
...add internal c0t4d0
zpool add internal c0t5d0
zpool add internal c0t6d0
zpool add internal c0t7d0
zpool add internal c1t0d0
zpool add internal c1t1d0
zpool add internal c1t2d0
zpool add internal c1t3d0
zpool add internal c1t4d0
zpool add internal c1t5d0
zpool add internal c1t6d0
zpool add internal c1t7d0
./bonnie++ -d /internal/ -s 8g -u0 -f
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
nitrogen 8G...
2007 Apr 11
0
raidz2 another resilver problem
...AVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open
c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
c4t1d0 AVAIL
c4t2d0 I...
2009 Dec 28
0
[storage-discuss] high read iops - more memory for arc?
...3.0? ?
> 0.0???81.3???1 100 c1t4d0
> >???414.2? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 28.6? ?
> 0.0???69.1???1? 98
> c1t5d0
> >???406.3? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.8? ? 0.0? 0.0 32.1? ?
> 0.0???79.0???1 100 c1t6d0
> >???404.3? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 31.9? ?
> 0.0???78.8???1 100 c1t7d0
> >???404.1? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 34.0? ?
> 0.0???84.1???1 100 c1t8d0
> >???407.1? ? 0.0? ?
> 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 31.2? ?
> 0.0???76.6???1 100 c1t9d0
> >???407.5? ? 0.0? ?
> 2.0? ? 0.0? 0.0 33.2? ?
> 0.0???81.4???1 100 c1t10d0
> >???402.8? ? 0.0? ?
> 2...
2009 Dec 24
1
high read iops - more memory for arc?
...32.0 0.0 79.2 1 100 c1t3d0
406.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 81.3 1 100 c1t4d0
414.2 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 69.1 1 98 c1t5d0
406.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 32.1 0.0 79.0 1 100 c1t6d0
404.3 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 31.9 0.0 78.8 1 100 c1t7d0
404.1 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 84.1 1 100 c1t8d0
407.1 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 31.2 0.0 76.6 1 100 c1t9d0
407.5 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 0.0 81.4 1 100 c1t10d0
402.8 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 33.5 0.0 83.2 1 100 c1t11d0
408.9 0.0 2.0...
2008 Apr 02
1
delete old zpool config?
...0
c7t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t6d0 ONLINE 0...
2007 Sep 08
1
zpool degraded status after resilver completed
...c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c8t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
c8t1d0 INUSE currently in use
errors:...
2008 Mar 12
3
Mixing RAIDZ and RAIDZ2 zvols in the same zpool
...t; c5t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c6t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c7t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> spares
>
>...
2007 Jun 19
0
Re: [storage-discuss] Performance expectations of iscsi targets?
...# zpool status thumper1-vdev0
> pool: thumper1-vdev0
> state: ONLINE
> scrub: none requested
> config:
>
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> thumper1-vdev0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> c8t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
>
> errors: No known data errors
>
> The first th...
2011 Jul 21
4
Raidz2 slow read speed (under 5MB/s)
...0 0 0
c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
I''d greatly appreciate it if someone could give me some leads on where the problem might be. I''ve spent the past 2 days on this, and it''s very frustrating since I would actually be very happy getting even 10MB/s r...
2009 Jun 19
8
x4500 resilvering spare taking forever?
...c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c0t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c5t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c7t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c6t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t3d0 ON...
2007 Feb 27
16
understanding zfs/thunoer "bottlenecks"?
Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance.
I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.).
According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would