search for: c1t0d0s0

...imported due to damaged devices or data. The pool may be active on another system, but can be imported using the ''-f'' flag. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-EY config: hdc FAULTED corrupted data mirror-0 DEGRADED c1t0d0s0 FAULTED corrupted data c8t1d0s0 ONLINE # zpool import -f hdc cannot import ''hdc'': one or more devices is currently unavailable Destroy and re-create the pool from a backup source. # zpool status pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested con...

Banging my head against a Seagate 3TB USB3 drive. Its marketing name is: Seagate Expansion 3 TB USB 3.0 Desktop External Hard Drive STAY3000102 format(1M) shows it identify itself as: Seagate-External-SG11-2.73TB Under both Solaris 10 and Solaris 11x, I receive the evil message: | I/O request is not aligned with 4096 disk sector size. | It is handled through Read Modify Write but the performance

...nOS neptune 5.11 snv_125 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-880 # zpool status pool: neptune_rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM neptune_rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Now I want to add two more mirrors to that pool because the V880 has more drives to offer, that are not used at the moment. So I''d like to add in a mirror of c1t1d0 and c1t4d0 : #...

...errors: No known data errors pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors Today I went to activate the BE for the new snv_127 install that I''ve been manually booting into, but "beadm activate..." will always fail, see here: root at arc:~# export BE_PRINT_ERR=true root at arc:~# beadm activate...

...e datapool/home zfs set mountpoint=legacy datapool/usr zfs set mountpoint=legacy datapool/opt zfs set mountpoint=legacy datapool/var zfs set mountpoint=legacy datapool/home zfs create -V 2g datapool/swap # http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/boot/zfsboot-manual/ zpool create -f rootpool c1t0d0s0 zfs create rootpool/rootfs zfs set mountpoint=legacy rootpool/rootfs mkdir /zfsroot mount -F zfs rootpool/rootfs /zfsroot cd /zfsroot ; mkdir -p usr opt var home export/home mount -F zfs datapool/usr /zfsroot/usr mount -F zfs datapool/opt /zfsroot/opt mount -F zfs datapool/var /zfsroot/var mount...

...attached to the cmdk driver work, but SMART fails because they are treated as ATA drives so ignore those) What appears broken is I cannot access any of the logs such as the typical counters that I *know* exist. If we look at sg3_utils output (prettier than smartctl) src/sg_logs /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s0 ATA WDC WD15EADS-00R 0A01 Supported log pages: 0x00 Supported log pages 0x00 Supported log pages 0x03 Error counters (read) 0x04 Error counters (read reverse) 0x00 Supported log pages 0x10 Self-test results 0x2...

the os ''s / first is on mirror /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 and /dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0, and then created home_pool using mirror, here is the mirror information. pool: omp_pool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM omp_pool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0...

On Solaris 10 If I install using ZFS root on only one drive is there a way to add another drive as a mirror later? Sorry if this was discussed already. I searched the archives and couldn''t find the answer. Thank you.

...ditions can I expect hot spares to be recruited? My zpool status showing the results is below. - Garrett > pfexec zpool status pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: testpool state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Replace the d...

Hi, Given two disk c1t0d0 (DISK A) and c1t1d0 (DISK B)... 1/ Standard install on DISK A. 2/ zfs boot install on DISK B. 3/ I change the boot order and my zfs boot works fine. 4/ I install grub on the mbr of DISK B 5/ I disconnect and replace DISK A with DISK B 6/ Reboot, get the grub menu select Solaris ZFS and it panics that it cannot mount root path @ device XXX... This is not a ZFS

...ls /dev/dsk c0t0d0s0 c0t0d0s3 c0t0d0s6 c1t0d0s1 c1t0d0s4 c1t0d0s7 c1t1d0s2 c1t1d0s5 c1t2d0 c1t2d0s2 c1t2d0s5 c1t3d0s0 c1t3d0s3 c1t3d0s6 c0t0d0s1 c0t0d0s4 c0t0d0s7 c1t0d0s2 c1t0d0s5 c1t1d0s0 c1t1d0s3 c1t1d0s6 c1t2d0s0 c1t2d0s3 c1t2d0s6 c1t3d0s1 c1t3d0s4 c0t0d0s2 c0t0d0s5 c1t0d0s0 c1t0d0s3 c1t0d0s6 c1t1d0s1 c1t1d0s4 c1t1d0s7 c1t2d0s1 c1t2d0s4 c1t3d0 c1t3d0s2 c1t3d0s5 # format Searching for disks...done AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c1t0d0 <SUN72G cyl 14087 alt 2 hd 24 sec 424> bootdisk /pci at 1c,600000/scsi at 2/sd at 0,0 1. c1t...

i'm trying to use rsync to mirror my server boot volume to another disk of the same size (120gb) on the same machine: % sudo rsync -avxuH --delete --progress /./ /volumes/cbc.server2/ although all of the files from the source volume appear to copy to the destination, if i try to boot from the destination volume the system doesn't recognize it as a bootable disk. anyone have any

...ring debugger (continue to save dump) The stress test zfs_force_umount_stress panics, see 2232. After rebooting, there is a pool created by zfs_force_umount_stress, then running ''zfs destroy'' panics. # df -h Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 8.9G 5.9G 2.9G 67% / /devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices /dev 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc mnttab...

Hi All, over the last couple of weeks, I had to boot from my rpool from various physical machines because some component on my laptop mainboard blew up (you know that burned electronics smell?). I can''t retrospectively document all I did, but I am sure I recreated the boot-archive, ran devfsadm -C and deleted /etc/zfs/zpool.cache several times. Now zpool status is referring to a

All, The attached script is causing the following error message ... bash-3.00# ./zmon_bug.d dtrace: error on enabled probe ID 2 (ID 4394: fbt:genunix:copen:entry): invalid address (0xfd91747f) in predicate at DIF offset 120 dtrace: error on enabled probe ID 2 (ID 4394: fbt:genunix:copen:entry): invalid address (0xfef81a3f) in predicate at DIF offset 120 Any ideas? thxs Joe --

...ash: SHA1 Hi. I am trying to move the root volume from an existing svm mirror to a zfs root. The machine is a Sun V880 (SPARC) running nv_96, with OBP version 4.22.34 which is AFAICT the latest. The svm mirror was constructed as follows / d4 m 18GB d14 d14 s 35GB c1t0d0s0 d24 s 35GB c1t1d0s0 swap d3 m 16GB d13 d13 s 16GB c1t0d0s3 d13 s 16GB c1t1d0s3 /var d5 m 8.0GB d15 d15 s 16GB c1t0d0s1 d25 s 16GB c1t1d0s1 I removed c1t1d0 from the mirror: # metadetach d4...

...same time maximize performance for single-pool I/O. > > I think it would be a serious performance mistake to combine the two > pools as vdevs in a single pool, though it''s perfectly possible. > > I.e. > (preferred) > zpool create smalltank raidz c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0 c1t0d0s0 c1t1d0s0 c1t2d0s0 > zpool create largetank raidz c1t0d0s1 c1t1d0s1 c1t2d0s1 > > instead of > > zpool create supertank raidz c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0 c1t0d0s0 c1t1d0s0 > c1t2d0s0 raidz c1t0d0s1 c1t1d0s1 c1t2d0s1 > > > > -- > Erik Trimble > Java System Support &...

Dear list, I''m about to upgrade a zpool from 10 to 29 version, I suppose that this upgrade will improve several performance issues that are present on 10, however inside that pool we have several zfs filesystems all of them are version 1 my first question is is there a problem with performance or any other problem if you operate a zpool 29 with zfs filesystems version 1 ? Is it better

...KSUM pool ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors pool: rpool state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors So, here I''ll work with "pool" which has a dedicated disk. I guess a similar technique should be valid for slice-based pools in MBR partition tables like "rpool" above, corrected for different par...

.... I first setup the system on a mirrored pool over the first two disks pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM rpool ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors and then tried to add the second pair of disks to this pool which did not work (famous error message reagding label, root pool BIOS issue). I therefore simply created an additional pool ta...