Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "c179c45".
Did you mean:
17945
2019 Sep 16
2
[LIBNBD SECURITY PATCH 0/1] NBD Protocol Downgrade Attack in libnbd
We discovered a possible Downgrade Attack in libnbd.
Lifecycle
---------
Reported: 2019-09-14 Fixed: 2019-09-16 Published: 2019-09-16
There is no CVE number assigned for this issue yet, but the bug is
being categorized and processed by Red Hat's security team which may
result in a CVE being published later.
Description
-----------
Libnbd includes the method nbd_set_tls(h,
2019 Sep 17
0
[PATCH libnbd 2/2] api: New API for reading NBD protocol.
...correct protocol \"%s\", expected \"newstyle-fixed\"\n", s);
+ exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
if ((r = nbd_get_size (nbd)) == -1) {
fprintf (stderr, "%s\n", nbd_get_error ());
exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
diff --git a/tests/oldstyle.c b/tests/oldstyle.c
index c179c45..b90b775 100644
--- a/tests/oldstyle.c
+++ b/tests/oldstyle.c
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ main (int argc, char *argv[])
char *args[] = { "nbdkit", "-s", "-o", "--exit-with-parent", "-v",
"memory", "size=" STR(SIZE),...
2019 Sep 17
3
[PATCH libnbd 1/2] api: Add new API to read whether TLS was negotiated.
When LIBNBD_TLS_ALLOW is used we don't have a way to find out if TLS
was really negotiated. This adds a flag and a way to read it back.
Unfortunately there is no test yet, because LIBNBD_TLS_ALLOW is not
tested -- it really should be but requires quite a complicated set of
tests because ideally we'd like to find out whether it falls back
correctly for all supported servers.
---
TODO