search for: c12t0d0

...action: Replace the device using ''zpool replace''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-4J scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0 c12t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t0d0 FAULTED 0 0 0 corrupted data c14t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c15t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 The device c12t0d0 appears two times!? ''format'' returns these devices: AVAILABLE DISK SELE...

.../model/size because this new one has 64MB cache vs. 16MB in the previous one. The removed disk will be use for backups, so I thought it''s better off to have a 64MB cache disk in the on-line pool than in the backup set sitting off-line all day. To replace it a I did: $ zpool datos offline c12t0d0 Shutdown the server, replace the physical disk and boot up back again. Then: $ zpool datos replace c12t0d0 Now the resilvering is taking way too much time to complete and the disk throughput is horrible. Take a look: zpool status pool: datos state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices is...

...AD WRITE CKSUM sasuc8i ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 5 108K resilvered c12t8d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 254G resilvered c12t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 1 21.5K resilvered c12t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 2 43K resilvered c12t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 4 86K resilvered c12t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 1 21.5K resilvered errors: No known data errors All I really cared about at this point was the &...

...ine it using ''zpool online''. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-3C scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank FAULTED 0 0 1 corrupted data raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 6 c12t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spare ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t7d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c12t4d0...

I''m looking for a way to backup my entire system, the rpool zfs pool to an external HDD so that it can be recovered in full if the internal HDD fails. Previously with Solaris 10 using UFS I would use ufsdump and ufsrestore, which worked so well, I was very confident with it. Now ZFS doesn''t have an exact replacement of this so I need to find a best practice to replace it.

On 5/5/10 1:44 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote: > On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 16:19 -0600, Evan Layton wrote: >> Can you try the following and see if it really thinks it''s an EFI lable? >> # dd if=/dev/dsk/c12t0d0s2 of=x skip=512 bs=1 count=10 >> # cat x >> >> This may help us determine if this is another instance of bug 6860320 > > # dd if=/dev/dsk/c12t0d0s2 of=x skip=512 bs=1 count=10 > 10+0 records in > 10+0 records out > 10 bytes (10 B) copied, 0.0259365 s, 0.4 kB/s >...