search for: c12

...6B-E06.g 45379 4383 5123 45 16B-E06.g 45138 4028 6249 52 16B-E06.g 48457 4267 5470 54 16B-E06.g 47740 4676 6769 48 37B-B02.g 42860 6152 19276 72 35B-A02.g 48325 12863 38274 143 35B-A02.g 48410 12806 39013 175 35B-A02.g 48417 9057 40923 176 35B-A02.g 51403 13865 43338 161 45B-C12.g 50939 3656 5783 43 45B-C12.g 52356 5524 6041 55 45B-C12.g 49338 5141 5266 41 45B-C12.g 51567 3915 5677 43 35A-G04.g 40365 5513 6971 32 35B-D01.g 54217 12607 13067 93 35B-D01.g 55283 11441 14964 101 35B-D01.g 55041 9626 14928 94 35B-D01.g 54058 9465 14912 88 35B-A04.g...

HI, Using c11<- 0.01 c12<- 0.01 c1<- 0.10 c2<- 0.10 One possible problem is that: dim(res5) #[1] 513? 20 res6<-aggregate(.~m1+n1+m+n,data=res5[,c(1:6,9:12,21:24)] ,max) #Error in `[.data.frame`(res5, , c(1:6, 9:12, 21:24)) : ?# undefined columns selected A.K. ________________________________ From: Joan...

I have a data.frame object like: > data.frame(x=c('A','A','B','B'), y=c('Ab','Ac','Ba','Bd')) x y 1 A Ab 2 A Ac 3 B Ba 4 B Bd how could I create a tree structure object like this: |---Ab A---| _| |---Ac | | |---Ba B---| |---Bb Thanks, Zech [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ause of size?). These are creating trouble with subsequent programs, which I tested with strings that for some reason do not have these double quotes (see very bottom). > cum1 [1] "A11*(X11*x1+X21*x2)+1*sqrt(B11*(X11*x1+X21*x2)^2+C11)A12*(X12*x1+X22*x2)+1*sqrt(B12*(X12*x1+X22*x2)^2+C12)A13*(X13*x1+X23*x2)+-1*sqrt(B13*(X13*x1+X23*x2)^2+C13)A14*(X14*x1+X24*x2)+-1*sqrt(B14*(X14*x1+X24*x2)^2+C14)A15*(X15*x1+X25*x2)+1*sqrt(B15*(X15*x1+X25*x2)^2+C15)A16*(X16*x1+X26*x2)+1*sqrt(B16*(X16*x1+X26*x2)^2+C16)A17*(X17*x1+X27*x2)+1*sqrt(B17*(X17*x1+X27*x2)^2+C17)A18*(X18*x1+X28*x2)+1*sqrt(B18*(...

...ello, I am working from a linux 64 machine on a server with R-2.12 (I can't update to 2.13). I am iterating through many linear mixed models for longitudinal data and I occasionally receive the following convergence error: > BI.lme <- lme(cd4 ~ time + genBI + genBI:time + C1 + C2 + C11 + C12, random =~ 1 + time | IID, data = d) Error in lme.formula(cd4 ~ time + genBI + genBI:time + PC1 + : nlminb problem, convergence error code = 1 message = false convergence (8) >From iteration to iteration, genBI is the only variable which changes and it is a numerical variable equal to 1,...

...es adding an exception on both machines: `iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 7777 -j ACCEPT ; service iptables save` The machines can ping each other. and they have the exact same config: cluster: node_count = 2 name = ocfs2 node: ip_port = 7777 ip_address = 10.128.255.3 number = 0 name = m3.c12.jiveip.net cluster = ocfs2 node: ip_port = 7777 ip_address = 10.128.7.33 number = 1 name = pbx_33.c12.jiveip.net cluster = ocfs2 I then decided to use tcpdump to see what's up (on both machines): `tcpdump -i eth0 port 7777 -v` Here is a TCP dump showing port 7777 is not blocked (I adde...

...1, 'V2 <-> V2','e2', 1, 'V3 <-> V3','e3', 1, 'V4 <-> V4','e4', 1, 'V5 <-> V5','e5', 1, 'F1 <-> F1','d1', 1, 'F2 <-> F2','d2', 1, 'F1 <-> F2','c12',NA, 'V1 <-> V2','cv1', NA, ),ncol=3,byrow=T) obs.vars.mh <- c('V1','V2','V3','V4','V5') rownames(data.mh) <- colnames(data.mh) <- obs.vars.mh sem.mh <- sem(model.mh, data.mh, 100) ### At this stage, everything looks g...

Thank you very much for your reply. Your code work well with this example. I modified a little to fit my real data, I got an error massage. Error in split.default(x = seq_len(nrow(x)), f = f, drop = drop, ...) : Group length is 0 but data length > 0 On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:21 PM, arun kirshna [via R] < ml-node+s789695n4657196h87@n4.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi, > Try this: >

Hi, > The patch in PR is wrong since it will make both darwin and windows > unhappy. I will comment on gentoo PR about possible proper solution. I'll give it a try as you comment on the gentoo PR. But my ppc box is in my office, so I'll post a result on next Monday (JST). Thanks,

...py. I will comment on gentoo PR about possible proper solution. > > I'll give it a try as you comment on the gentoo PR. > But my ppc box is in my office, so I'll post a result on next Monday (JST). I posted my result on the gentoo PR. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c12 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c13 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c14 Thanks,

Where are the patches mentioned in the bug report comments? The specific one I'm refering to is http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15323#c12. The comment mentions that it's attached, but I can't seem to access the attachment.

Hello all, here's a collection of answers I got on my question concerning partial correlation coefficients: Some people gave a simple formula for the three-variable-case, as did Dave Lucy: pcor <- function(v1, v2, v3) { c12 <- cor(v1, v2) c23 <- cor(v2, v3) c13 <- cor(v1, v3) partial <- (c12-(c13*c23))/(sqrt(1-(c13^2)) * sqrt(1-(c23^2))) return(partial) } The general algorithm was given by John Logsdon, among others: The partial correlation coefficients are the negative scaled off-diago...

...namespace and getting everything to link, I am getting=20 > only about 75% of the tests passing. Is this to be expected or have > I broken something? I think that you broke something, specifically the C backend. See this comment for details: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=109#c12 Basically you accidentally renamed 'llvm-dis -c' to 'llvm-dis -c_code'. -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

...0 0 5 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 1 0 attr(,"assign") [1] 1 1 1 1 NA does not appear, fine with me. Certainly, this is not exactly the same as Minitab's INDICATOR: INDICATOR C2, C11-C15 C2 C11 C12 C13 C14 C15 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 ------> 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 * * * * * * where * is missing code in Minit...

...2 vs X3|X2 vs X4| |X3 vs X1|X3 vs X2| X3 |X3 vs X4| |X4 vs X1|X4 vs X2|X4 vs X3| X4 | It is possible with this command (> pairs(X)) to draw a figure which both indicates the values of correlation coefficients and give the linear regressions of variables? Like this: | X1 | C12 | C13 | C14 | |X2 vs X1| X2 | C23 | C24 | |X3 vs X1|X3 vs X2| X3 | C34 | |X4 vs X1|X4 vs X2|X4 vs X3| X4 | Cij indicate the value of the correlation coefficient for the linear regression of the variable i with the variable j. i=1...4, j=1...4 Xi vs Xj indicate a...

...inance, with two kinds of related events. However, imagine you have a known amount of carbon (so many kilograms), but you do not know what fraction is C14 (and thus radioactive). Only the C14 will give decay events (and once that event has occurred, the atom that decayed will never decay again). C12 will never decay. What you want to know is a) what is the ratio of C12 to C14 at time 0, and b) how many decay events will happen between time X and time y, or how many decay events will happen after time z. That integral, is, IIRC, quite simple. The data you get from your equipment will be a nu...

...<- cbind(zz[,1],averagedResults ) colnames(averagedResults) <- c("PCI","G1-C1","G1-C2","G1-C3","G1-C4","G1-C5","G1-C6","G1-C7","G1-C8", "G2-C9","G2-C10","G2-C11","G2-C12","G2-C13","G2-C14","G2-C15","G2-C16", "G3-C17","G3-C18","G3-C19","G3-C20","G3-C21","G3-C22","G3-C23", "G4-C24","G4-C25","G4-C26","G4-C27","...

Hello, after thorough searching of the R help files as well as S+-help, I'm coming to the list: Is there a possibility to compute partial correlation coefficients between multiple variables (correlation between two paired samples with the "effects of all other variables partialled out")? All I seem to find are the standard Pearson correlation coefficients (with cor()) and no clue

...ail.com> wrote: >> >> Are you still having issues with FMA4? I wonder if PR15040 is related. A >> fix was just committed. Unfortunately r173176 does not fix this. I have updated the trunk and ran...Miscompare still persists. Going by http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14185#c12 , I am inclined to think that it is an optimization. (If it is an encoding issue, dragonegg would have failed as well...). or maybe I am missing something here. -Anitha > > It seems to be so! I will look into it immediately. > > Apologies for the late e-mail. I ran out of tim...

..."a31" "a32" "b11" "b12" [13] "b13" "b21" "b31" "b32" "b33" "b41" [19] "b42" "c11" "c12" "c21" "c22" "c23" [25] "c31" "c32" "c33" "d11" "d12" "d13" [31] "d14" "d21" "d22"...