search for: c0t0d0

(for some reason I cannot find my original thread..so I''m reposting it) I am trying to move my data off of a 40gb 3.5" drive to a 40gb 2.5" drive. This is in a Netra running Solaris 10. Originally what I did was: zpool attach -f rpool c0t0d0 c0t2d0. Then I did an installboot on c0t2d0s0. Didnt work. I was not able to boot from my second drive (c0t2d0). I cannot remember my other commands but I ended up removing c0t2d0 from my pool. So here is how it looks now: # zpool status -v pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested...

I have seen conflicting examples on how to create zpools using full disks. The zpool(1M) page uses "c0t0d0" but OpenSolaris Bible and others show "c0t0d0p0". E.g.: zpool create tank raidz c0t0d0 c0t1d0 c0t2d0 c0t3d0 c0t4d0 c0t5d0 zpool create tank raidz c0t0d0p0 c0t1d0p0 c0t2d0p0 c0t3d0p0 c0t4d0p0 c0t5d0p0 I have not been able to find any discussion on whether (or when) to add the &quo...

...fig back, but even when raidctl says "I''m fine", zpool complains that it cannot open one of the replicas: # raidctl RAID Volume RAID RAID Disk Volume Type Status Disk Status ------------------------------------------------------ c0t0d0 IM OK c0t0d0 OK c0t1d0 OK c0t2d0 IM OK c0t2d0 OK c0t3d0 OK # zpool status -x pool: dpool state: FAULTED status: One or more devices could not be opened....

Hi all, just after sending a message to sunmanagers I realized that my question should rather have gone here. So sunmanagers please excus ethe double post: I have inherited a X4140 (8 SAS slots) and have just setup the system with Solaris 10 09. I first setup the system on a mirrored pool over the first two disks pool: rpool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME

...Assembled 03 June 2008 Installed from DVD as ZFS boot filesystems 1 SAN disk attached from IBM SVC using DS8300 storage. 2 - 1 port Qlogic cards attached to McData 6064 Directors Here''s my questions: 1. After the install I created a zfs mirror of the root disk c0t0d0 to c0t1d0, format shows the mirrored disk with sectors instead of cylinders, is this normal or correct? Is there a way to reverse this back to cylinders if it is not? Same goes for the external disk pool using SAN disk from the IBM SVC. 2. After enabled MPxIO (stmsboot -e), the 2 root disks now...

Hi All, ZPOOL / ZFS commands writes EFI label on a device if we create ZPOOL/ZFS fs on it. Is it true ? I formatted a device with VTOC lable and I created a ZFS file system on it. Now which label the ZFS device has ? is it old VTOC or EFI ? After creating the ZFS file system on a VTOC labeled disk, I am seeing the following warning messages. Feb 3 07:47:00 scoobyb

I spend yesterday all day evading my data of one of the Windows disks, so that I can add it to the pool. Using mount-ntfs, it''s a pain due to its slowness. But once I finished, I thought "Cool, let''s do it". So I added the disk using the zero slice notation (c0d0s0), as suggested for performance reasons. I checked the pool status and noticed however that the pool size

Kind of a newbie question here -- or I haven''t been able to find great search terms for this... Does ZFS recognize zpool members based on drive serial number or some other unique, drive-associated ID? Or is it based off the drive''s location (c0t0d0, etc). I''m wondering because I have a zpool set up across a bunch of drives and I am planning to move those drives to another port on the controller potentially changing their location -- as well as the location of my "boot" zpool (two disks). Will ZFS detect this and be smart...

...extended device statistics r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c3t0d0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4t0d0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c0t0d0 0.0 400.9 0.0 49560.1 14.1 0.5 35.2 1.2 47 48 c5t0d0 0.0 156.0 0.0 18327.1 4.6 0.2 29.5 1.1 17 18 c5t1d0 0.0 7.0 0.0 132.0 2.7 0.0 386.0 4.9 56 2 c5t2d0 0.0 293.0 0.0 36735.2 13.4 0.3 45.6 1.1 89 34 c5t3d0 0.0 0.0 0.0...

...ct, or there must be another way to get the pool configuration: # zpool status -v pool: maxPool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM maxPool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t6d0 ONLINE 0...

...files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ +++++ +++ csmith-desktop,8G,,,42807,21,25278,7,,,65191,6,118.4,0,16,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++,+++++,+++ zpool create internal c0t0d0 ./bonnie++ -d /internal/ -s 8g -u0 -f Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP nitrogen 8G...

IF you run solaris and opensolaris ?for example you my use c0t0d0 (for scsi disk) or c0d0 (for ide /SATA disk ) as the system disk. In default ,solaris x86 and opensolaris will use RAW driver : c0t0d0s0 (/dev/rdsk/c0t0d0s0) as the member driver of rpool. Infact, solaris2 partition can be more then one in each Hard Disk, so we also can use the RAW driver like :...

We''ve been experimenting with zfs on OpenSolaris 2008.11. We created a pool in OpenSolaris and filled it with data. Then we wanted to move it to a production Solaris 10 machine (generic_137138_09) so I "zpool exported" in OpenSolaris, moved the storage, and "zpool imported" in Solaris 10. We got: Cannot import ''deadpool'': pool is formatted

hi all, i''ve been using a SAN LUN as the sole member of a zpool with one additional zfs filesystem. this is a flat SAN fabric, so this LUN was available to other systems on the fabric, and one of them came up with "wrong magic number" for several drives, and, as best i can tell, the vtoc for my zpool LUN was over-written on that host via format labeling to correct the error.

...blocker Priority: P1 Component: other AssignedTo: ajscarp at yahoo.com ReportedBy: darrenm at opensolaris.org QAContact: hua.tang at sun.com CC: zfs-crypto-discuss at opensolaris.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 # zpool create -f tank mirror c0t0d0 c0t1d0 log c7t0d0 cache c6t0d0 # zpool set keysource=raw,file:///root/tank.key tank Invalid keysource change. # zpool key -l tank Key Load Error: Invalid keysource property value. However if a keysource was set at pool creation ''zpool set'' can perform the valid changes. # pkt...

As mentioned last night, we''ve been reviewing a proposal for hot spare support in ZFS. Below you can find a current draft of the proposed interfaces. This has not yet been submitted for ARC review, but comments are welcome. Note that this does not include any enhanced FMA diagnosis to determine when a device is "faulted". This will come in a follow-on project, of which some

..., possibly in a degraded state. action: Wait for the resilver to complete. scrub: resilver in progress, 0.35% done, 8h19m to go config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM thumper-9 DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c4t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c6t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c7t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c0t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t1d0...

...ow is a snippet of iostat: > > > >? ???r/s? ? > w/s???Mr/s???Mw/s wait actv > wsvc_t asvc_t? %w? %b device > >? ???0.0? ? 0.0? > ? 0.0? ? 0.0? 0.0? 0.0? ? > 0.0? ? 0.0???0???0 > c0 > >? ???0.0? ? 0.0? > ? 0.0? ? 0.0? 0.0? 0.0? ? > 0.0? ? 0.0???0???0 > c0t0d0 > >? > 4898.3???34.2???23.2? > ? 1.4? 0.1 385.3? ? > 0.0???78.1???0 1246 c1 > >? ???0.0? ? 0.8? > ? 0.0? ? 0.0? 0.0? 0.0? ? > 0.0???16.0???0???1 > c1t0d0 > >???401.7? ? 0.0? ? > 1.9? ? 0.0? 0.0 31.5? ? > 0.0???78.5???1 100 c1t1d0 > >???421.2? ? 0.0? ?...

Hello experts, I would like consult you some questions regarding RFE 6334757 and CR 6322205 (disk write cache). ========================================== RFE 6334757 disk write cache should be enabled and should have a tool to switch it on and off CR 6322205 Enable disk write cache if ZFS owns the disk ========================================== The cu found on SPARC Enterprise T5140,

...t. However, of course, the pool isn''t imported. When I execute "zpool import", the pool is detected fine: pool: zp id: 2070286287887108251 state: ONLINE action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier. config: zp ONLINE raidz1 ONLINE c0t1d0 ONLINE c0t0d0 ONLINE c0t3d0 ONLINE c0t2d0 ONLINE The next issue is that when the pool is actually imported ("zpool import -f zp"), it too hangs the whole system, albeit after a minute or so of disk activity. A "zpool iostat zp 10" during that time is below: capacity operations bandwidth...