Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "c0hen".
2016 Jun 28
2
[GSoC 2016] Implementation of the packing transformation
2016-06-27 15:52 GMT+05:00 4lbert C0hen <4lbert.h.c0hen at gmail.com>:
> Dear Roman and all,
>
> Such features would be extremely useful to implement array expansion (scalar
> and array renaming, privatization with new subscript expressions of higher
> dimension) and storage mapping optimization (generalizing array
&...
2016 Jun 29
0
[GSoC 2016] Implementation of the packing transformation
On 06/28/2016 10:53 AM, Roman Gareev wrote:
> 2016-06-27 15:52 GMT+05:00 4lbert C0hen <4lbert.h.c0hen at gmail.com>:
>> Dear Roman and all,
>>
>> Such features would be extremely useful to implement array expansion (scalar
>> and array renaming, privatization with new subscript expressions of higher
>> dimension) and storage mapping optimization (...
2016 May 28
1
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication
Sorry for not responding earlier.
On 05/20/2016 03:05 PM, Roman Gareev wrote:
> Thank you very much for the advices! I could probably try to avoid
> using of nonhardware prefetching in the project, if Tobias doesn’t
> disagree with it. My understanding is that prefetching isn’t used
> explicitly in [1] and, according to [2], in some cases 90% of the
> turbo boost peak of the
2016 May 20
0
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication
2016-05-19 21:45 GMT+05:00 4lbert C0hen <4lbert.h.c0hen at gmail.com>:
> One short note. I would advise against spending time on prefetching for x86.
> Recent hardware prefetchers are amazingly good at strided accesses in
> single-threaded code. Caution: this is not based on objective/published
> data, but on personal e...
2016 May 17
4
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication
On 05/17/2016 01:47 PM, Michael Kruse wrote:
> 2016-05-16 19:52 GMT+02:00 Roman Gareev <gareevroman at gmail.com>:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> could we use information about memory accesses of a SCoP statement and
>> def-use chains to determine statements, which don’t contain matrix
>> multiplication of the following form?
>
> Assuming s/don't/do you want