Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "c0e83c77".
2013 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] ELF safe/unsafe sections
...t; Shankar Easwaran*
> *
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130725/c0e83c77/attachment.html>
2013 Jul 25
4
[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] ELF safe/unsafe sections
Hi,
Currently lld ties up all atoms in a section for ELF together. This
proposal just breaks it by handling it differently.
*This requires **NO ELF ABI changes.
*_*Definitions :-*_
A section is not considered safe if there is some code that appears to
be present between function boundaries (or) optimizes sections to place
data at the end or beginning of a section (that contains no symbol).