Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "c0a0d60".
Did you mean:
c0a0d60e
2019 Aug 08
2
Suboptimal code generated by clang+llc in quite a common scenario (?)
Hi Tim and Alex
Thanks for your replies.
So just to make it clear for me: does this imply that there’s indeed no way on the current version to tell the compiler or Clang to optimize this?
Thanks,
Joan
> On 8 Aug 2019, at 18:30, Tim Northover via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 17:08, Alex Brachet-Mialot via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at