Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "c0963455".
Did you mean:
c016f455
2012 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] Clang question
You don't have memcpy or want it to always lower it?
-eric
On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Christoph,
>
> Yes, you are correct on the lifetime calls, they are just markers for liveness.
>
> However, the backend is not optimizing these calls away. I could try to deal with them outside of llvm but I was hoping for a cleaner
2012 Mar 05
2
[LLVMdev] Clang question
Christoph,
Yes, you are correct on the lifetime calls, they are just markers for
liveness.
However, the backend is not optimizing these calls away. I could try to
deal with them outside of llvm but I was hoping for a cleaner solution
using llvm?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Christoph Erhardt <christoph at sicherha.de>wrote:
> Hi Ryan,
>
> the compiler is free to insert
2012 Mar 05
6
[LLVMdev] Clang question
...opers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120305/c0963455/attachment.html>