search for: c0963455

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "c0963455".

Did you mean: c016f455
2012 Mar 05
0
[LLVMdev] Clang question
You don't have memcpy or want it to always lower it? -eric On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > Christoph, > > Yes, you are correct on the lifetime calls, they are just markers for liveness. > > However, the backend is not optimizing these calls away. I could try to deal with them outside of llvm but I was hoping for a cleaner
2012 Mar 05
2
[LLVMdev] Clang question
Christoph, Yes, you are correct on the lifetime calls, they are just markers for liveness. However, the backend is not optimizing these calls away. I could try to deal with them outside of llvm but I was hoping for a cleaner solution using llvm? On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Christoph Erhardt <christoph at sicherha.de>wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > the compiler is free to insert
2012 Mar 05
6
[LLVMdev] Clang question
...opers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120305/c0963455/attachment.html>