Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "bz561299".
2011 Feb 02
4
Blasphemous? any support for a REPO of current edition BIND, et al (e.g., BZ561299)?
Hello CentOS Community Members,
What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient
code base for such important programs as BIND et al?
A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago
on the isc.org mailing list.
Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current
vintage for such important functions as BIND et al?
That question is based on the presumption that time is taking us to a
more complete and correct implementat...