search for: bytespersect

...disk and same parameters as we've been using for our example, and with some debugging of the variables enabled, you'll see the following output: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DskSize = 195369519, ReservedSecCnt = 32, SecPerClus = 64, NumFATs=2, BytesPerSect = 512 Numerator = 4 * (195369519 - 32) = 781477948 Denominator = (64 * 512) + (4 * 2) = 32776 FatSz = (781477948 / 32776) + 1 = 23843 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Now, the algorithm mentions that this computation is based on a formula by Rune Moeller Ba...

...s as we've been using for our example, and with > some debugging of the variables enabled, you'll see the following output: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > DskSize = 195369519, ReservedSecCnt = 32, SecPerClus = 64, NumFATs=2, > BytesPerSect = 512 > > Numerator = 4 * (195369519 - 32) = 781477948 > Denominator = (64 * 512) + (4 * 2) = 32776 > FatSz = (781477948 / 32776) + 1 = 23843 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Now, the algorithm mentions that this computation is bas...

Hi Ady, On 2016.02.25 02:08, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > There is an "extra" sector, in comparison to... what exactly? Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think I implied that the Large FAT32 fat size had an extra sector compared to minfatsize, when of course I meant the opposite (the Large FAT32 has one less sector than the minfatsize computed by the unpatched code, hence the check