Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "byteranges".
Did you mean:
byterange
2013 Jun 03
1
Announce: Tool for replicating filesystem changes
...uld' portability to the existing inotify-like APIs
on most mainstream operating systems is very possible and expected.
* The maximum useful value for /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches is 32768 .
Which is quickly exceeded on any moderate Maildir deployment.
* inotify has no concept of byteranges to indicate where a modification
happened.
Architecture Discussion
-----------------------
* inotify is about extending specific Linux filesystems. But replication
ought to be as filesystem-independent as possible as well as
independent of operating sytems and versions, so inotify is not id...
2018 Nov 22
0
Index Corruption xBase database
from smbstatus man page:
-B|--byterange
causes smbstatus to include byte range locks.
the fact is that 4 different connections are opening the same byte
range in 'MOVCTA.cdx'
That's about all that I can get from your command result dump.
On 2018-11-22 9:21 a.m., Jose Concha wrote:
> Using oplocks = no makes the communication extremely slow. For testing
>
2004 Nov 03
1
3.0.8pre2 and smbstatus
Hallo,
in 3.0.8pre2 the smbstatus command always shows connections _and_ shares even if using the switches '-p' for showing processes only or '-S' for showing shares only or '-B' for showing locks only:
test2 # smbstatus --help
Usage: [OPTION...]
-p, --processes Show processes only
-v, --verbose Be verbose
-L, --locks
2018 Nov 22
5
Index Corruption xBase database
Hello,
I've been working with a xBase database (similar to dBase) in a multiuser
application. There are like 40 users working on the database on the same
time reading and like 10 writing information.
Sometimes the CDX files (Index Files) get corrupted and is it's necessary
to pack the tables (rebuild the indexes).
I have notice using the smbstatus -B command the following
Pid