Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "byte2".
Did you mean:
byte
2016 Dec 09
0
BSWAP matching in codegen
...overage for the tree pattern,
> but it is failing to match the patterns we use in our tests, one of
> which looks like this:
>
> define i32 @test_tree(i32 %x) {
>
> %byte0 = and i32 %x, 255 ; 0x000000ff
>
> %byte1 = and i32 %x, 65280 ; 0x0000ff00
>
> %byte2 = and i32 %x, 16711680 ; 0x00ff0000
>
> %byte3 = and i32 %x, 4278190080 ; 0xff000000
>
> %tmp0 = shl i32 %byte0, 8
>
> %tmp1 = lshr i32 %byte1, 8
>
> %tmp2 = shl i32 %byte2, 8
>
> %tmp3 = lshr i32 %byte3, 8
>
> %or0 = or i32 %tmp0, %tmp1
>
>...
2003 Jun 13
2
Trouble decoding number of codebooks
I'm having trouble decoding the number of codebooks out of an ogg file,
and was wondering if anyone here could lend a hand?
I read in the sync pattern, and I think the codebook dimensions properly,
but when I try and read in the number of codebook entries, I get a number
larger than the number of bytes in the file, which I have to assume is
wrong :)
Anyway this is how I read in the numbers :
2016 Dec 08
2
BSWAP matching in codegen
>> Are you sure there isn't any test coverage? As far as I can tell, the tests from https://reviews.llvm.org/rL133503 are still in the tree.
I looked at those, but none of them include the full pattern that decomposes into bswap and rol. I debugged through the X86 bswap.ll test and verified none of those cases make it through MatchBSwapHWord (they get handled in MatchBSwapHWordLow
2006 Nov 30
6
zaptel compilation problems with linux 2.6.19
Hello!
I have problems compiling zaptel (tried 1.2.11, 1.2.10 and 1.4.0-beta2 -- all
give the same error) with 2.6.19 kernel
CC [M] /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/card_fxo.o
In file included
from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/xpd.h:26,
from /home/roman/install/asterisk/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2/xpp/card_fxo.c:28:
2006 Nov 17
1
gjournal on 6.x wont build
Hi all,
I was intending on trying out gjournal on a new disk i've added in my
desktop. I had a look to see what the most recent patch provided by
Pawel and found
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/gjournal6_20061024.patch
I created the directories as per Pawel's original post
(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2006-June/001962.html)
and the patch succeeded with no failed