Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "bysprofile".
Did you mean:
bydprofile
2014 Nov 25
3
[LLVMdev] new set of superoptimizer results
...rofile.html
>
> In other words, if you implement optimizations near the top of this list,
> you would be likely to make LLVM compile SPEC CPU 2006 in less time.
>
> Here are the optimizations sorted by static profile count:
>
> http://blog.regehr.org/extra_files/souper-nov-14/bysprofile.html
>
> Implementing the highly ranked ones would be likely to make the clang
> binary smaller.
>
> Finally here are the optimizations sorted by size; this is handy because
> the higher-ranked ones are generally easier to understand:
>
> http://blog.regehr.org/extra_files...
2014 Nov 24
2
[LLVMdev] new set of superoptimizer results
I hope there's some useful material in here!
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/1192
John
2014 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] new set of superoptimizer results
...; In other words, if you implement optimizations near the top of this list,
>> you would be likely to make LLVM compile SPEC CPU 2006 in less time.
>>
>> Here are the optimizations sorted by static profile count:
>>
>> http://blog.regehr.org/extra_files/souper-nov-14/bysprofile.html
>>
>> Implementing the highly ranked ones would be likely to make the clang
>> binary smaller.
>>
>> Finally here are the optimizations sorted by size; this is handy because
>> the higher-ranked ones are generally easier to understand:
>>
>> ht...