search for: byos

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "byos".

Did you mean: bios
2005 Aug 12
4
Dell Poweredge 1400
Hi all, In this moment I have the opportunity to install asterisk in Poweredge 1400 Dell Server (PIII, 2 GB of RAM). I wonder if any of you have any experience running asterisk (+ Digium cards) on this kind of hardware, any comment about know problems or good experiences are welcome. Thanks in advance. Alejandro Acosta,-
2007 Feb 04
1
Help - Received response: "Forbidden" from '"Unknown"
I have a weird problem.... Asterisk 1.4 E100P connected to a Panasonic TDA phone system Here is what I get SIP Ext -> Panasonic Ext No Problems Panasonic Ext -> SIP Ext No Problems SIP Ext -> VOIP Provider No Problems Panasonic Ext -> VOIP Provider Errors ---------- Working SIP -> VOIP -- Executing [903........@from-sip:1] Dial("SIP/610-097aee60",
2008 Jun 21
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5554] New: File has vanished for files with foreign/unicode characters
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5554 Summary: File has vanished for files with foreign/unicode characters Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2007 Jan 28
0
Trouble outgoing VOIP Provider Calls
I have a weird problem.... Asterisk 1.4 E100P connected to a Panasonic TDA phone system Here is what I get SIP Ext -> Panasonic Extensions No Problems Panasonic Ext -> SIP Extensions No Problems SIP Ext -> VOIP Provider No Problems Panasonic Ext -> VOIP Provider Errors ---------- Working SIP -> VOIP -- Executing [903........@from-sip:1]
2007 Feb 05
0
Help - Received response: "Forbidden" from'"Unknown"
I did a NoOp and see what the callerid was and when coming from the SIP Ext->Voip it is set to the Extension Number of the SIP Extension (as you would expect). When coming from the Panasonic the CallerID is blank, I tried setting it to nothing again, and I tried setting it to the callerid of the voip provider, a sip extension id, the extension number on the Panasonic side, the zap channel
2025 May 19
2
pidpath, altpidpath, statepath considered muddled or confusing
...ogram should not be able to create that default file name and cause a DoS by telling UPSes to turn off. But these are nuances known when packaging for a particular deployment strategy, not something that is good to impose out of the box, so the default is as it was for least-surprise for long-time BYOS rebuilders going from source. Hope this helps, Jim Klimov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20250519/a0f6c5da/attachment-0001.htm>
2025 May 19
1
pidpath, altpidpath, statepath considered muddled or confusing
> Also the upsmon POWERDOWNFLAG fits into this question I'm confused. That flag can't be persistent across reboots, can it?
2012 Feb 01
0
ADVERT: two courses in R programming
Ken Rice and I will give a course on advanced R programming in two locations this summer. 1. In Edinburgh, June 13-15 (the week before the International Conference in Quantitative Genetics). See http://www.eisg2012.org.uk/ 2. In Seattle, July 23-25, as part of the Summer Institute in Statistical Genetics. See http://www.biostat.washington.edu/suminst/sisg/general The course is about 60% lecture
2025 May 14
2
UPS configuration issue?
This sub-thread is veering off-topic from the original question... but I'll digress. >> However debian's legendary slowness to update things does test my >> patience at times. The fact that bookworms default nut is 2.8.0 is an >> example. Per https://www.debian.org/News/2023/20230610 they released the 12th (bookworm) baseline on June 10, 2023, and `bookworm will be
2025 May 14
1
UPS configuration issue?
On 5/13/25 21:05, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > gene heskett via Nut-upsuser writes: > >> However debians legendary slowness to update things does test my >> patience at times. The fact that bookworms default nut is 2.8.0 is an >> example. > > That sounds familiar. Debian's been shipping very old versions of my > packages, which was ?irritating. I am not being
2016 Oct 05
3
Dev: new option to mark all tincd socket of a tincd process
I know i'm new to the list but i'd like to propose something for tincd daemon. I'd like to mark all sockets established by a tincd process with a mark passed as an argument in the command line. What could be the purpose of this new option? The goal of this option is to be able to have several tincd process running at the same time using the same port but using different ip. In
2010 Nov 06
10
Apparent SAS HBA failure-- now what?
My setup: A SuperMicro 24-drive chassis with Intel dual-processor motherboard, three LSI SAS3081E controllers, and 24 SATA 2TB hard drives, divided into three pools with each pool a single eight-disk RAID-Z2. (Boot is an SSD connected to motherboard SATA.) This morning I got a cheerful email from my monitoring script: "Zchecker has discovered a problem on bigdawg." The full output is
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++
2018 Nov 16
0
Fwd: Tinc with DPDK
Hello Tinc guys, I was wondering if somebody has had the intend to develop a tinc version using DPDK and KNI type interface to see the increase in term of speed by running everything in userland? Do you think it may be something interesting? I see some of my use cases where it could be really fun to have TINC VPN running underĀ  DPDK.... Thank you for your feedback. Olivier T