Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "burningcutleri".
Did you mean:
burningcutlery
2011 Feb 17
0
[LLVMdev] bytecode cache
I think the way to do this is to generate a shared library which you
reload. Shared libraries already handle the problems of PIC code and
relocatable globals, so I think it would be best to leverage that.
However, there's obviously some issues here. Presumably you don't
have all the code up front, or you wouldn't be using a JIT in the
first place. I don't think you can update
2011 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] bytecode cache
Hi!
Is it possible to implement a byte code cache for a llvm-jit?
This way the compile time occurs only once and the next time
the compiled machine code can simply be loaded from disk.
Of course care has to be taken with function pointers that are
used as constants since they may change on the next run.
-Jochen