search for: burdoned

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Daniel M Gessel <gessel at apple.com> wrote: > Thanks - that solves both problems. > > In the future, HW may have built in ADDE support, but will likely > still not have flags - it'll just read 3 registers and write two. > > Any thoughts there? Yes. What I think should happen is flags need to be less of a hack. There are two cases,

Thanks - that solves both problems. In the future, HW may have built in ADDE support, but will likely still not have flags - it'll just read 3 registers and write two. Any thoughts there? Thanks, Dan On Oct 27, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Daniel M Gessel <gessel at apple.com> > wrote: >> The language I'm

I can think of many people that use LLVM and maintain out of tree extentions that will likely never be incorporated into mainline. Maintaining out of tree intrnisics takes a fair amount of work and leads to the choice of using a single version of LLVM for a project (and thus have to manually incorporate bug fixes) or risk untimely breakage. I propose that the plugin be extended to allow plugable

...server, a seperate Rsync.exe is spawned. Each Rsync uses up to 20% CPU util. Obviously, the machine is constantly running at 100% CPU. Not desireable, since I want to add yet another 30 sites! Do you people think that if we would use a Linux server instead of a Win2K server, the CPU would be less burdoned? Thx already! Bart Coninckx Network Administrator CNE, ASE ************************************* Watco ICT Services Lilsedijk 19 B-2340 Beerse e-mail: bart.coninckx@watco.be Tel: + 32 (0) 14 60 99 42 Fax: + 32 (0) 14 62 41 47 ************************************* ========================== Di...

From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:15 +1030 > Asking people to express 'CC: stable' in words is error-prone; if Dave > wants to filter it, he's quite capable. Filtering it one time is one thing. Potentially acting on that filter 100 or so times a day... That's completely another.

From: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:30:15 +1030 > Asking people to express 'CC: stable' in words is error-prone; if Dave > wants to filter it, he's quite capable. Filtering it one time is one thing. Potentially acting on that filter 100 or so times a day... That's completely another.

Thanks very much for your help. I didn't quite understand how adde really uses flags in, say x86 or any of the other architectures I looked at. It seemed to declare it used EFLAGS, but little else: like how would you feed a zero in for the carry. Or I suppose you would have to start such a sequence off with an addc, and I happened to hit the adde (and it bailed) first (because the

Warren Young wrote: > [...] >>> What do they suggest as a replacement? > > Stratis: https://stratis-storage.github.io/StratisSoftwareDesign.pdf Can I use that now? > The main downside to Stratis I see is that it looks like 1.0 is scheduled to coincide with RHEL 8, based on the release dates of RHELs past, which means it won?t have any kind of redundant storage options to

Hi John, all, I still have at least 3 issues: 1) What are we trying to achieve with the "source-ID"? 8 [uint] Source ID (Unique amongst all OggPCM streams in the physical stream) Are we trying to separate the different channels that may be interleaved with each other inside the flat multi-channel sample stream? Interpretation 1: ----------------- So, would each channel be in a

Hello, Please be conscious of Digium's bandwidth and use a Mirror when downloading 1.0. I have mirrored the tarballs at: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/ Direct links: ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/asterisk-sounds-1.0.0.tar.gz ftp://ftp.nacs.net/asterisk/libpri-1.0.0.tar.gz -- Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc.

[mod: This discussion has been going on "offline" with an occasional CC to linux-security. By the time I got around to do another "moderation round" this one was the latest. Everyone is keeping good context, so I think you all will be able to follow the discussion. --REW] >>>>> <seifried@seifried.org> writes: >> The only thing I can see coming out

Changing the subject since this is rather Btrfs specific now. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 5:41 AM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017, 11:55 AM Mark Haney <mark.haney at neonova.net> wrote: >> >>> To be honest, I'd not try a btrfs volume on a notebook SSD. I did that on >>> a >>> couple of