search for: burder

...n decisions taken when designing it, may or may not defer from other textual IRs like LLVM or PTX. I have a number of questions: 1) It seems to me that a template backend either the C backend or NVPTX are possible starting points. However, only NVPTX makes use of tblgen which removes some burder from the backend developer. I also think that a tblgen-based backend like NVPTX is easier to maintain in the long term. What do you think? 2) NAC uses the following statement form (for any given statement): dst1, dst2, ..., dstm <= op src1, src2, ..., srcn; which expresses an operation op...

...t; designing it, may or may not defer from other textual IRs like LLVM or PTX. > > I have a number of questions: > > 1) It seems to me that a template backend either the C backend or NVPTX are > possible starting points. However, only NVPTX makes use of tblgen which > removes some burder from the backend developer. I also think that a > tblgen-based backend like NVPTX is easier to maintain in the long term. What > do you think? Hi Nikolaos, The C backend (that is by the way deprecated) is the exception rather than the rule: most targets use TableGen extensively (look at all...

Hi Linhai, > Hi, > > I have some applications, which have been compiled into llvm IR and then > linked into executable programs. I have some static information got from > analysing llvm IR, and some dynamic information, like which binary branch is > taken, from hardware sampler. I am wondering whether there are some ways to map > binary code with LLVM IR. The only way I

Hi, I have some applications, which have been compiled into llvm IR and then linked into executable programs. I have some static information got from analysing llvm IR, and some dynamic information, like which binary branch is taken, from hardware sampler. I am wondering whether there are some ways to map binary code with LLVM IR. The only way I know is to use debug info, since both llvm

...om other textual IRs like LLVM or > PTX. > > > > I have a number of questions: > > > > 1) It seems to me that a template backend either the C backend or NVPTX > are > > possible starting points. However, only NVPTX makes use of tblgen which > > removes some burder from the backend developer. I also think that a > > tblgen-based backend like NVPTX is easier to maintain in the long term. > What > > do you think? > > Hi Nikolaos, > > The C backend (that is by the way deprecated) is the exception rather > than the rule: most targets...